then we wont be able to see the planets and it would be hard to see the consolations.
who really cares
the study of astronomy is to collect lite from objects in deep space with telescopes and ridio telescopes and to find out how life evolved
Without the atmosphere that we breath, there would be no human life on earth.
Refracting telescopes suffer from chromatic aberration, refracting telescopes have several surfaces to shape and polish, making large glass lenses without interior defects is very difficult, and large glass lenses are more difficult to support than large mirrors.
i would have to say yes only because without the sun we would have no life on earth as we know it and if there were no nucleus there would be no cell if there i would have to say yes only because without the sun we would have no life on earth as we know it and if there were no nucleus there would be no cell if there
they have huge telescopes looking for life
life without ukulele would be dissapointing
You can see distant and tiny objects. We would not know of cells or microorganisms without microscopes, and we would know little about space without telescopes.
Life would stink.
There would be no life.
There would be no life because without the geometry of the water molecule, there would be no water. No water, no life.
Life would be nothing there's really nothing life would be without adrenal glands because really god created people such as( life) so to me i think life would live without adrenal glands;
A quadrilateral is a shape with four sides. A life without quadrilaterals would mean a life without squares, rectangles, parallelograms, and rhombuses.
Life would not exist.
Light enters space telescope without distortion from Earth's atmosphere
There would be no life without energy. No life will sustain.
who really cares