True. In an experiment, a scientist formulates a hypothesis, designs the experiment, collects data, and then analyzes the results to draw conclusions. The outcome of the experiment is not known beforehand, and it is the results of the experiment that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
A research scientist conducts experiments, collects data, and analyzes results to further scientific knowledge in their field. They may also collaborate with other scientists, write research papers, and present findings at conferences. Additionally, research scientists often secure funding for their projects through grants or institutional support.
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
If the personal opinion of a scientist affects the way that the experimental results are reported, that is called bias.
with a good idea of the expected experimental results.
repeated trials
scientists will generally repeat the experiment until they they do match
Apex.The experimental results failed to support the conclusion.
True. In an experiment, a scientist formulates a hypothesis, designs the experiment, collects data, and then analyzes the results to draw conclusions. The outcome of the experiment is not known beforehand, and it is the results of the experiment that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
Because it helps them know the results of the objects in the experiment and how they differ. This way the scientist knows which succeeded and which failed.
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
The scientific method and peer review are two methods that a scientist uses to obtain empirical evidence. Experimental design and reproduction of results are two other methods.
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
A scientist would likely be less inclined to revise her experimental methods if the results consistently align with established scientific principles, if the methods have been extensively validated in prior studies, and if there is strong consensus within the scientific community on the efficacy of the methods used.