0
When a scientist analyzes experimental results, they are generally seeking to identify patterns, relationships, or trends within the data. This process involves comparing the results against hypotheses or predictions to determine if they support or refute them. Additionally, scientists often use statistical methods to assess the significance of their findings, ensuring that the results are not due to random chance. Ultimately, this analysis helps in drawing conclusions and guiding further research.
What else can I help you with?
A scientist who performs an experiment has no idea what the outcome of the experiment is going to be true or false?
True. In an experiment, a scientist formulates a hypothesis, designs the experiment, collects data, and then analyzes the results to draw conclusions. The outcome of the experiment is not known beforehand, and it is the results of the experiment that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
WHEN analyzing data does the scientist look for?
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
When analyzing data which the scientist look for?
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
What does a research scientist do for a living?
A research scientist conducts experiments, collects data, and analyzes results to further scientific knowledge in their field. They may also collaborate with other scientists, write research papers, and present findings at conferences. Additionally, research scientists often secure funding for their projects through grants or institutional support.
When a scientist finds that a hypothesis is wrong the scientist usually?
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
What is it called when a scientist personal opinion affects the way experimental results are reported?
If the personal opinion of a scientist affects the way that the experimental results are reported, that is called bias.
How do scientist usually design experiments?
with a good idea of the expected experimental results.
What do scientist use to make sure that experimental results are not due to change?
repeated trials
If experimental results do not match their prediction. what will sientits generally do?
scientists will generally repeat the experiment until they they do match
In response to peer review a scientific journal might choose not to publish a paper submitted by a scientist. Which of the following is a reason why a paper might be rejected for publication?
Apex.The experimental results failed to support the conclusion.
A scientist who performs an experiment has no idea what the outcome of the experiment is going to be true or false?
True. In an experiment, a scientist formulates a hypothesis, designs the experiment, collects data, and then analyzes the results to draw conclusions. The outcome of the experiment is not known beforehand, and it is the results of the experiment that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
Why do scientist use control groups in experiments?
Because it helps them know the results of the objects in the experiment and how they differ. This way the scientist knows which succeeded and which failed.
When analyzing data which the scientist look for?
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
WHEN analyzing data does the scientist look for?
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
What are two methods scientist use to obtain emperical evidence?
The scientific method and peer review are two methods that a scientist uses to obtain empirical evidence. Experimental design and reproduction of results are two other methods.
When analyzing data which does the scientist look for?
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
In which situation would it be least likely for a scientist to revise her experimental methods?
A scientist would likely be less inclined to revise her experimental methods if the results consistently align with established scientific principles, if the methods have been extensively validated in prior studies, and if there is strong consensus within the scientific community on the efficacy of the methods used.
