When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
No - you can use evidence from an experiment to support a theory, but they are not the same thing. A theory is an idea as to why something is, how it works, etc. that is strongly supported by evidence. An experiment is set up in order to gather information to support a theory or to help a hypothesis become a theory.
hypothesis
If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the data collected from experiments or observations did not provide sufficient evidence to disprove that hypothesis. This does not necessarily prove the hypothesis to be true; rather, it indicates that there is not enough support to conclude it is false. The results may suggest that further research is needed to explore the hypothesis more thoroughly. Ultimately, the failure to reject a hypothesis is a part of the scientific process and contributes to the ongoing evaluation of scientific theories.
when there s proof to back it up with evidence or an experiment to test the hypothesis
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
when there s proof to back it up with evidence or an experiment to test the hypothesis
The scientific method is common to all science. Hypothesis, experiment, reformulate the hypothesis basied on evidence from experiment and repeat!
Evidence is data from an experiment which is used to verify or reject the original hypothesis in the conclusion. Evidence is gathered through the scientific method.
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
There is no experiment or possible evidence that could prove that invisible snorgs do not exist. So the Snorg Hypothesis is not scientific. On the other hand, the "Negative Snorg Hypothesis" (that they do not exist) is scientific. You can disprove it by catching one.
To prove the validity of your hypothesis in a scientific experiment, you need to conduct tests and collect data that either support or refute your hypothesis. This involves designing a controlled experiment, following a structured methodology, analyzing the results objectively, and drawing conclusions based on the evidence gathered. It is important to ensure that your experiment is replicable and that your results are statistically significant to establish the credibility of your hypothesis.
It is important for a hypothesis to be testable in order to conduct a valid scientific experiment because testability allows researchers to gather evidence that either supports or refutes the hypothesis. This helps ensure that the results of the experiment are reliable and can be used to draw meaningful conclusions about the natural world.
A hypothesis states a predicted outcome for an experiment, while an experiment is designed to test the validity of the hypothesis by collecting data and analyzing results. The experiment provides empirical evidence to either support or refute the hypothesis. The relationship between hypothesis and experiment is crucial in the scientific method for forming and testing ideas.
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.