544 million years ago was the Proterozoic era. This was before visible life on the planet. This long ago the inhabitants wouldn't necessarily leave a fossil. If there is a lack of fossil evidence after this that means there was a mass extinction in this part of the world, and nothing survived to have children to leave fossils. Eventually another species will migrate in but until that happens there would be no fossil evidence.
Scientists, as a diverse group, may hold a range of beliefs based on evidence and research. In general, scientists believe in the scientific method as a reliable way to investigate and understand the natural world. They prioritize critical thinking, skepticism, and empirical evidence in their pursuit of knowledge.
It depends, because some might say 'scientists'. But not all scientists believe in this theory. Also, there are those who believe in a similar idea to the Big Bang, but it is not refered to as 'The Big Band Theory.'
I believe the reason behind using specific gravity is that it is easier to measure (especially when you're measuring it for a solid).
Scientists believe that the water on Mars exists primarily as ice, particularly in the polar ice caps and beneath the surface. There are also signs of transient liquid water in the form of briny flows, but these are less common. The detection of hydrated minerals suggests that water once flowed on the Martian surface, indicating a more dynamic water history in the past. Overall, while liquid water is scarce today, evidence supports that Mars has a significant amount of water in various states.
Not necessarily, as belief in evolution and belief in global warming don't really have anything to do with each other. That said, a person who believes in evolution is probably more likely to believe in global warming, as they tend to listen to what scientists say, and scientists are the biggest advocates for global warming being real.
It means scientists don't believe something unless there's significant evidence, theoretical or experimental, that strongly suggest or prove it
food
There is no evidence of that, in fact most scientists believe it is expanding.
Scientists believe from geological evidence that humans originated in Kenya, Ethiopia, and Tanzania.
Because there is no credible evidence to indicate they have.
this is true:)
Scientists, as a diverse group, may hold a range of beliefs based on evidence and research. In general, scientists believe in the scientific method as a reliable way to investigate and understand the natural world. They prioritize critical thinking, skepticism, and empirical evidence in their pursuit of knowledge.
It was Alfred Wegener but other scientists did not believe him but he found evidence
Many scientists do not believe in ghosts because there is no scientific evidence to support their existence. Ghosts are generally seen as a phenomenon that falls more into the realm of culture, folklore, and belief systems rather than scientific inquiry. Scientists prioritize evidence-based explanations for the world around us, which typically do not include supernatural entities like ghosts.
They believe that the evidence point to this group of people living in Africa.
Some people believe in that theory, but some people believe in Adam and Eve. Scientists claim that they have found evidence that we started from apes.
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.