No, by the time star light reaches your eyes, the stars have moved on. So we see the stars in a position as they once where.
No. We are seeing as it was. The light we are seeing now was first emitted some time ago. We see the other planets in our solar system as they were a few minutes to a few hours ago. We see stars as they were a few years to a few centuries ago. We see other galaxies as they were millions to billions of years ago.
We can look for it by using these tecniqes. •Seeing it in rocks (meteorites) •Seeing it gravitationally •Seeing it spectroscopically (remote sensing) •Seeing morphological features of it (remote sensing) •Seeing it (remote sensing)
No, people do not think stars are shrinking when they look at them. People look at the stars because they are fascinated by the beauty and wonder of the night sky. Studying stars also helps us understand the universe and our place in it.
Awed firstly. A realization that egois meaningless. When I look at the Universe I see myself and no longer alone
There was no universe a googol years ago. The universe is only between 10-20 billion years old.
Yes, when we look up at the night sky and see stars, we are actually seeing them as they were in the past due to the time it takes for their light to reach us.
No, as it was. Light takes time to travel...hence, we have lght years, or the distance light travels over a year. It is assumed that the universe is 14 billion years old. When you look up at night you see star light that may be moments old and some thousands of years old, others millions of years old. Your seeing the fourth dimension, time... spread out, over time, all at one time.
No. We are seeing as it was. The light we are seeing now was first emitted some time ago. We see the other planets in our solar system as they were a few minutes to a few hours ago. We see stars as they were a few years to a few centuries ago. We see other galaxies as they were millions to billions of years ago.
What are you asking? then ask it again soit makes sense because " I look forward to seeing you soon" sounds like exactly what it says. What's to ask?
some of the stars we see in the universe took millions of years to get here - we are seeing what it looked like a million years ago.
Yes, "I look forward to seeing you" Is correct grammar.
The past tense of "we look forward to seeing you" is "we looked forward to seeing you."
do you say I look for seeing you or I look forward to seeing you
We can look for it by using these tecniqes. •Seeing it in rocks (meteorites) •Seeing it gravitationally •Seeing it spectroscopically (remote sensing) •Seeing morphological features of it (remote sensing) •Seeing it (remote sensing)
One way to respond to the fact that people around the world are not all seeing the same constellations would be to say that we are all gazing out into the universe, into the largely-unknown. Also, people around the world view all of the same constellations, just not at the same time of the year.
Yes they are they are better than any fishies in the universe!! ( opinion)They get use to seeing the owner's face and then they look at you and you see there pudgy face!They will be shy at first but they will get used to you.
The correct phrase is "look forward to seeing you on Saturday." This form is the most commonly used and grammatically correct way to express anticipation for seeing someone on a specific day.