All around the crime scene, and sometimes in the get away car
Non
Because there is little or none of it.
Scientists find evidence in fossils and living things such as changes in morphology, genetic similarities, and transitional forms that support the theory of evolution. Fossils can show physical adaptations over time, and living organisms can reflect common ancestry through shared genetic traits. These pieces of evidence help scientists to understand the evolutionary history and relationships between different species.
Because all of our knowledge of the past is based of of their evidence and damaging anything not only is equivalent to the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars, it is also a irretrievable loss of knowledge. Furthermore, carelessness may result in misinterpretation of the evidence and/or contamination of the evidence which is even worse than loss, as it may cause incorrect conclusions to be drawn.
You can support your ideas by citing specific quotes or passages from the text that directly relate to the point you are trying to make. Look for evidence that is clear, specific, and relevant to your argument. Be sure to provide context and analysis to explain how the evidence supports your ideas.
You would find evidence
What evidence did the archaeologist find to suggest that the Tainos existed
Well..., on the internet in books what kind of evidence
look for evidence that's what it means
yes the police can do wht they want
Scientists found evidence in Rodinia in Antartica.
direct evidence is the observation as it occurs
you should find more supporting evidence!
EXCULPATORY evidence.
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
In (reproducable) experiments.
Juvenile judge find me guilty no evidence just one the victim Asia but the victim witness said he wasn't me