I think the hippo would kill the bear .. u know what .. hippo is one of the most dangerous animal on the planet ..and its male is intimidating as hell ... as well as very aggressive .....on the other side ..the polar bear is the dominator in his place ... but has never put in a real challenge ... chasing snow foxes .. and confronting weak walruses ..... is nothing compared to hippopotamus exchanging bites against crocs .. as a matter of fact .. the hippo is larger than the bear ...and well armoured. ....if this fight takes place semi shallow water or in dry land ..the bear will circle the hippo and the only chances to win is wearing down the bear by its formidable claws and canines ... but i tell you .. the bear will surely fail ...
It depends on the organism and how different the new environment is from their original habitat. Some organisms may adapt and survive, while others may not be able to survive due to factors like temperature, moisture levels, food availability, or competition with other species.
An animal that weighs half a ton is likely to be a large mammal such as an adult male polar bear or a male African elephant. Both of these animals can weigh up to 2,000 pounds (one ton), with the average weight falling around half that amount. It's important to note that individual animals may vary in weight, so specific examples may not always fit this generalization.
The mongoose is known for producing a natural defense against snake venom. When bitten by a snake, it can neutralize the venom and survive the attack.
This behavior is known as playing possum, where the animal pretends to be dead or injured to deter a potential threat. By appearing lifeless, they hope the predator will lose interest and leave them alone. This defensive mechanism is a way for the animal to avoid confrontation and survive in the wild.
living things can survive in the water beneath a lake's frozen surface
Yes and ancient elephant would survive today with the technoledgy But only in India
no
grass plants
The large African elephant ears serve the purpose of regulating the elephant's body temperature. They help the elephant survive in its natural habitat by dissipating excess heat and cooling the body through increased blood flow to the ears, allowing the elephant to stay cool in hot environments.
It would be extremely challenging for an elephant to survive with only three legs due to their large body size and weight. The missing leg would likely lead to significant mobility issues and difficulty in foraging for food, ultimately impacting the elephant's ability to survive in the wild.
by protecting its self
i don't know at all
well...it needs food and water and people
by drinking red bulls and monsters and alot of water.
Size advantage is one adaptation. It's able to lose heat to survive in such environments. The trunk is the arm of an elephant allowing it to drink and eat.
because the weight of the elephant compresses the mountain, therefore the elephant falls to ground level with the mountain if you are dumb read below the elephant is fat and squishes the mountain
The chances for an Elephant to survive without a trunk are next to nothing. They use their trunk to smell, touch, pick up objects and food, signal each other and bring water to their mouths. Without being able to do these things, an Elephant would have to rely on a Human or other Elephant to feed them, and they would lead miserable lives.