The density of uranium is 19,1 g/cm3.
The net density of the earth is much higher than the density of the materials that make up the crust and other portions of the planet that we can reach. There for the parts we cannot yet reach must have a much greater density, or the net density would not be as great as it is.
If the planet is smaller, then it can't have the same size. If you assume that a smaller planet has the same density as Earth (and therefore less mass), its surface gravity will be smaller. If you assume that a smaller planet has the same mass as Earth (and therefore more density), its surface gravity will be greater. This is because we would be closer to the planet's center - or to the planet's matter in general.
no because its density is greater than one ( anything less than one, density wise would float ____________________ Actually, only Saturn "would float"; ie, has a density less than 1. Earth has a density of 5.5 or so, and if there were a big enough bathtub, would sink like the rock it is.
It would be greater.
Venus is the planet most similar to Earth in size, mass, volume, and density. It is often referred to as Earth's "sister planet" due to these similarities despite having a very different atmosphere and surface conditions.
Uranium has the greater density. Note that "1 g" is irrelevant - the density of a substance doesn't depend on how much of the substance you take.
Earth's density: 5520 kg/m3 Saturn's density: 690 kg/m³
The net density of the earth is much higher than the density of the materials that make up the crust and other portions of the planet that we can reach. There for the parts we cannot yet reach must have a much greater density, or the net density would not be as great as it is.
Less
Uranium is more dense than lead, yes. The density of the two metals is 19.1 and 11.34 grams per cubic centimeter, respectively. That makes uranium almost twice as dense as lead.
No
If the planet is smaller, then it can't have the same size. If you assume that a smaller planet has the same density as Earth (and therefore less mass), its surface gravity will be smaller. If you assume that a smaller planet has the same mass as Earth (and therefore more density), its surface gravity will be greater. This is because we would be closer to the planet's center - or to the planet's matter in general.
no because its density is greater than one ( anything less than one, density wise would float ____________________ Actually, only Saturn "would float"; ie, has a density less than 1. Earth has a density of 5.5 or so, and if there were a big enough bathtub, would sink like the rock it is.
The Earth has the greatest average density, of all the planets.
It would require an immense amount of uranium, far beyond what is accessible on Earth, to detonate the planet. The idea of destroying Earth with uranium or any other material is simply not feasible with current technology.
it is mars it has water
Earth has the highest density, which is equal to 5.5153 g/cm3 However, if you remove gravitational compression the materials of which Mercury is made would be denser, with an uncompressed density of 5.3 g/cm3 versus Earth's 4.4 g/cm3