0
According to the kinetic theory of gases, one assumption is that the forces of attraction between particles can be ignored, particularly under ordinary conditions. However, a key point that is not an assumption of the kinetic theory is that gas particles occupy a significant volume compared to the total volume of the gas, which is incorrect; the theory assumes that gas particles themselves have negligible volume. Additionally, the theory assumes that gas particles are in constant, random motion and collide elastically with one another and the walls of their container.
What else can I help you with?
. Which is notan assumption about particles in a gas according to the kinetic theory The forces of attraction among particles keep the particles close together. The motion of one particle is unaffecte?
According to the kinetic theory of gases, one key assumption is that the forces of attraction among particles are negligible, allowing them to move freely and independently. Therefore, the statement "The forces of attraction among particles keep the particles close together" is not an assumption of the kinetic theory. Additionally, it assumes that the motion of one particle is unaffected by others, which highlights the idealized nature of gas behavior in this theory.
Why can scientists ignore the forces of attraction between particles in a gas under ordinary condition?
They are too weak to have an effect at great distrances between gas particles.
Which is not assumption about particles in a gas according to the kinetic theory?
One assumption of the kinetic theory of gases is that gas particles occupy a negligible volume compared to the volume of the container. Therefore, the idea that gas particles have significant volume or that they interact through forces that significantly affect their motion would not align with the assumptions of the kinetic theory. Additionally, the assumption that gas particles are in constant random motion contradicts any notion of them being at rest or having fixed positions.
Which is not an true assumption about particles in a gas according to the kinetic theory?
One assumption of the kinetic theory of gases is that gas particles are in constant, random motion and do not attract or repel each other. Therefore, a false assumption would be that gas particles experience significant intermolecular forces, as this contradicts the idea that they behave independently. Additionally, the kinetic theory assumes that the volume of the individual gas particles is negligible compared to the total volume of the gas, so assuming that particles occupy significant space would also be incorrect.
What are the forces of attraction between the particles of a liquid?
Surface tension .
. Which is notan assumption about particles in a gas according to the kinetic theory The forces of attraction among particles keep the particles close together. The motion of one particle is unaffecte?
According to the kinetic theory of gases, one key assumption is that the forces of attraction among particles are negligible, allowing them to move freely and independently. Therefore, the statement "The forces of attraction among particles keep the particles close together" is not an assumption of the kinetic theory. Additionally, it assumes that the motion of one particle is unaffected by others, which highlights the idealized nature of gas behavior in this theory.
Why can scientists ignore the forces of attraction between particles in a gas under ordinary condition?
They are too weak to have an effect at great distrances between gas particles.
What does it look like when forces of attraction among the particles are so weak that they can be ignored under ordinary conditions?
When forces of attraction are negligible among particles, the substance tends to exist in a gaseous state at ordinary conditions. The particles are far apart and exhibit random motion, resulting in a high degree of kinetic energy that overcomes any weak intermolecular forces present.
Is the attraction between steel particles stronger than the attraction between copper particles?
yes
Which is not assumption about particles in a gas according to the kinetic theory?
One assumption of the kinetic theory of gases is that gas particles occupy a negligible volume compared to the volume of the container. Therefore, the idea that gas particles have significant volume or that they interact through forces that significantly affect their motion would not align with the assumptions of the kinetic theory. Additionally, the assumption that gas particles are in constant random motion contradicts any notion of them being at rest or having fixed positions.
Which is not an true assumption about particles in a gas according to the kinetic theory?
One assumption of the kinetic theory of gases is that gas particles are in constant, random motion and do not attract or repel each other. Therefore, a false assumption would be that gas particles experience significant intermolecular forces, as this contradicts the idea that they behave independently. Additionally, the kinetic theory assumes that the volume of the individual gas particles is negligible compared to the total volume of the gas, so assuming that particles occupy significant space would also be incorrect.
What are the forces of attraction between the particles of a liquid?
Surface tension .
Do forces of attraction have a stronger effect on behavior of the particles in gas or in a liquid?
Forces of attraction have a stronger effect on the behavior of liquid particles.
What is an attraction between particles of the same substance called?
An attraction between particles of the SAME substance is called cohesion.
Is this true there are no forces of attraction between the particles in a gas?
It's not entirely true that there are no forces of attraction between particles in a gas. While gas particles are far apart and move freely, there are weak intermolecular forces present, such as van der Waals forces. However, these forces are negligible compared to the kinetic energy of the particles at typical gas temperatures, allowing them to behave independently. Therefore, while attraction exists, it does not significantly affect their behavior under normal conditions.
Are there no forces of attraction between the particles in a gas?
In a gas, the forces of attraction between particles are negligible compared to their kinetic energy, allowing the particles to move freely and occupy the available space. While there are weak intermolecular forces, they are not significant enough to affect the behavior of gas particles under normal conditions. This lack of strong attraction results in gases being highly compressible and expandable. However, at extremely high pressures or low temperatures, these forces can become more relevant.
What is a natural attraction in chemistry?
An attraction or force between particles that causes them to combine.
