berilium
Defining what is cruel is a very subjective topic. Although a person's opinions differ from others, common characteristics may include acting aggressive without provocation, a constant desire to harm or upset others, and a lack of empathy or kindness.
They were not cruel and not necessarily bad leaders. Augustus's successor was a reluctant emperor and did not like to get involved in politics. Caligula was the only one who had a reputation for being cruel and this was caused by mental illness. Claudius did many good things for Rome and the empire Nero was eccentric and was subjected to a lot of slander. However, he was not a bad ruler and was loved by the poor.
she was a very cruel horrible woman who killed protestants coz they wernt catholic like Mary
The 8th amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the government from imposing excessive bail, fines, or cruel and unusual punishment on individuals accused or convicted of a crime. Its purpose is to protect individuals from unfair and disproportionate punishment by the state.
An analogy for a fragile heart.
It goes along with the 8th amendment. If the amount is excessive for the crime committed, it can be considered as unusual or cruel.
The practice of using pig nose rings is considered by some to be cruel because it causes pain and discomfort to the animal.
No. Thats considered cruel
sex isn't cruel...RAPE is cruel. Forcing someone to have sex with u is illegal and considered rape. As long as you say no and resist then its RAPE. If u don't wanna do and they make u then that is RAPE. That is Cruel!
Overcrowding in prisons definitely is considered to be cruel and unusual punishment. This is not safe and definitely not humane.
Wilkerson v. Utah was the case in which it was decided that burning at the stake was considered to be cruel and unusual punishment. While this case addressed the idea that shooting a person to death was considered cruel and unusual punishment the government looked at all manners of death that should be labeled as such.
yes, it is considered a sport, but as cruel as it is, dont try it
put in a cage with many lions to die
To our way of thinking and by our present day standards, yes, Cleopatra could be considered cruel. However, we should not judge the ancients by our standards as they did not live by them. In reality Cleopatra was no more cruel than any other ruler of her time.
No, he's actually considered "Extreamly unfair, and cruel.", by the people he works with.
Badly. They were considered property, barely had any rights, and many other cruel treatments like abuse were considered ok.
Silk is usually produced by silkworms, which are living creatures. I have no idea how it can possibly be cruel, except that after the worms spin the silk, the people harvest it removing the silkworm habitat.