There are several answers to this question, but the most commonly found answer is: Coal, petroleum, natural gas, zinc, tin, limestone,iron ore, salt, slate, clay, chalk, gypsum, lead, silica, and arable land. there are also all the water bottles they produce. :) hope thats helpful
Yes, industrialization would likely be hindered if the United States was poor in natural resources as industries heavily rely on these resources for production. Without abundant natural resources, the country may struggle to compete globally in manufacturing and industrial sectors, leading to slower economic growth and development. Alternative strategies such as imports or technological innovations could potentially offset the limitations imposed by the lack of natural resources.
A lack of natural resources could have slowed down industrialization in the US, as industries rely on resources like coal, iron, and oil to grow. It may have forced the country to seek alternative sources, potentially leading to higher costs of production and reduced competitiveness in the global market. The development of technology and innovation could have been slower without access to key resources.
At the beginning of industrialization, abundant natural resources included coal, iron ore, and timber. Coal was crucial for powering steam engines and heating factories, while iron ore was essential for manufacturing machinery and infrastructure. Additionally, access to waterways facilitated the transportation of these resources, further fueling industrial growth. These resources laid the foundation for the rapid advancements in technology and production during the Industrial Revolution.
Industrialization significantly impacted Manchester's natural environment by leading to rapid urbanization, increased pollution, and the depletion of natural resources. The growth of factories and the expansion of the city resulted in the emission of smoke and chemicals, severely degrading air and water quality. Additionally, the demand for land for industrial use and housing led to the destruction of green spaces and natural habitats, altering the landscape and threatening local biodiversity. Overall, the environmental consequences of industrialization in Manchester were profound and lasting.
What are the natural resources of Columbia
gasese
If the U.S. had been poor in Natural Resources, how would industrialization have been affected
what were the four natural resources needed for British industrialization
just because it does
New Technology Then
water power coal and iron ore
Ines A. Smyth has written: 'Industrialization and natural resources' -- subject(s): Human ecology, Natural resources, Quality of life
Geography and Natural ResourcesLarge labor force and stable governmentScientific advancements and excess wealthAll of the above are correct.
Yes, industrialization would likely be hindered if the United States was poor in natural resources as industries heavily rely on these resources for production. Without abundant natural resources, the country may struggle to compete globally in manufacturing and industrial sectors, leading to slower economic growth and development. Alternative strategies such as imports or technological innovations could potentially offset the limitations imposed by the lack of natural resources.
(Apex) Access to natural resources that provided the materials and power needed for industrialization.
A lack of natural resources could have slowed down industrialization in the US, as industries rely on resources like coal, iron, and oil to grow. It may have forced the country to seek alternative sources, potentially leading to higher costs of production and reduced competitiveness in the global market. The development of technology and innovation could have been slower without access to key resources.
Cheap labor, the Civil War, railroads, and natural resources helped to fuel industrialization in the South. The 1890's marked the start of the industrialization of not only the South but the entire United States.