There are several answers to this question, but the most commonly found answer is: Coal, petroleum, natural gas, zinc, tin, limestone,iron ore, salt, slate, clay, chalk, gypsum, lead, silica, and arable land. there are also all the water bottles they produce. :) hope thats helpful
Yes, industrialization would likely be hindered if the United States was poor in natural resources as industries heavily rely on these resources for production. Without abundant natural resources, the country may struggle to compete globally in manufacturing and industrial sectors, leading to slower economic growth and development. Alternative strategies such as imports or technological innovations could potentially offset the limitations imposed by the lack of natural resources.
A lack of natural resources could have slowed down industrialization in the US, as industries rely on resources like coal, iron, and oil to grow. It may have forced the country to seek alternative sources, potentially leading to higher costs of production and reduced competitiveness in the global market. The development of technology and innovation could have been slower without access to key resources.
What are the natural resources of Columbia
1. Excessive or unecessary use of resources. 2. Non-equitable distribution of resources. 3. Technological and industrial development. 4. Erosion. 5. Irrigation. 6. Mining for oil and minerals. 7. Drainage of wetlands. 8. Deforestation.
Natural resources are a subset of resources. Natural resources are materials that occur in nature and can be used for economic gain, such as coal, water, or sunlight. Resources, on the other hand, can refer to a broader range of assets or commodities that can be used to achieve a specific goal or outcome.
gasese
If the U.S. had been poor in Natural Resources, how would industrialization have been affected
what were the four natural resources needed for British industrialization
just because it does
New Technology Then
water power coal and iron ore
Ines A. Smyth has written: 'Industrialization and natural resources' -- subject(s): Human ecology, Natural resources, Quality of life
Yes, industrialization would likely be hindered if the United States was poor in natural resources as industries heavily rely on these resources for production. Without abundant natural resources, the country may struggle to compete globally in manufacturing and industrial sectors, leading to slower economic growth and development. Alternative strategies such as imports or technological innovations could potentially offset the limitations imposed by the lack of natural resources.
(Apex) Access to natural resources that provided the materials and power needed for industrialization.
Geography and Natural ResourcesLarge labor force and stable governmentScientific advancements and excess wealthAll of the above are correct.
A lack of natural resources could have slowed down industrialization in the US, as industries rely on resources like coal, iron, and oil to grow. It may have forced the country to seek alternative sources, potentially leading to higher costs of production and reduced competitiveness in the global market. The development of technology and innovation could have been slower without access to key resources.
Cheap labor, the Civil War, railroads, and natural resources helped to fuel industrialization in the South. The 1890's marked the start of the industrialization of not only the South but the entire United States.