ok
It would take about 5-7 minutes for the primary or P-waves to reach a seismograph station in Miami, Florida from Seattle, Washington. These waves travel faster than secondary or S-waves, which would arrive a few minutes later.
Several hours after an earthquake, the seismograph would likely show small aftershocks or seismic activity continuing to register on the graph, but with decreasing intensity as time progresses. The initial sharp spikes from the main earthquake would have subsided, leaving a more regular, lower amplitude signal on the seismograph paper.
To determine which recording station was closest to the epicenter of the earthquake, you would typically analyze the arrival times of the seismic waves recorded at each station. The station with the shortest time interval between the arrival of the primary (P) wave and the secondary (S) wave would be the closest to the epicenter. If you have specific data points or seismograms, you can calculate the distance based on these wave arrivals.
Humidity would not be included in a station model.
The Mercalli intensity scale would be most appropriate for describing historic earthquakes where seismograph records are not available. This scale categorizes earthquakes based on the observed effects on people, buildings, and the environment rather than on instrumental measurements. It provides a qualitative description of the earthquake's intensity and impact.
Three stations would best pinpoint the epicentre by triangulation.
The seismograph for a larger earthquake would show stronger and more prolonged seismic waves compared to a smaller earthquake. The amplitude and duration of the seismic waves recorded by the seismograph would be greater for the larger earthquake.
It would take about 5-7 minutes for the primary or P-waves to reach a seismograph station in Miami, Florida from Seattle, Washington. These waves travel faster than secondary or S-waves, which would arrive a few minutes later.
I dont know about newer ones but older ones had a pen hovering a piece of paper and the siesmic waves would make them move.
Since a seismograph is a device used to measure the magnitude earthquakes, someone who studies earthquakes would use it.
It would depend on the size of the quake. It is certainly possible to use only one seismograph, it would just be impossible to use triangulation to find the epicenter of the tremble, as it requires at least three.
A seismograph is placed under the ground. Somewhere not to close to the surface, as when something on the surface moves, then it would be recorded on the seismograph. Something on the surface that moves can be a vehical driving along the road.
Idkk
explain why a seismograph would not work if the pen vibrated along with the rest of the machine.
it would change to make the record look smaller
Yes, a seismograph is a type of technology used to detect and record earthquakes. It measures the motion of the ground caused by seismic waves generated by earthquakes or other sources of seismic energy.
Several hours after an earthquake, the seismograph would likely show small aftershocks or seismic activity continuing to register on the graph, but with decreasing intensity as time progresses. The initial sharp spikes from the main earthquake would have subsided, leaving a more regular, lower amplitude signal on the seismograph paper.