they had the right to speak freely and worship as they chose.
An objective statement about the picture could be: "The image shows two individuals standing under a tree on a sunny day, with sunlight filtering through the leaves. Both people are smiling and appear to be engaged in conversation." This description focuses on observable details without inferring emotions or intentions.
A plant-eating mammal that lives under the sea is commonly known as a sea cow or a manatee.
A statement or fact that describes how something will behave under certain conditions is known as a hypothesis. It predicts the outcome of an experiment based on specific variables and conditions. For example, if the temperature increases, then the solubility of a substance in a solvent will also increase. This predictive statement can be tested through experimentation to confirm or refute its validity.
A zebra lives under the trees and in the grass of the grasslands
Answer Of course they did! Thousands and thousands of people died!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
It was when the US government over dramatised the Bolshevik revolution because they did not like communism and so made anti-communist propaganda, causing people to fear 'Communism' like a disease. pretty stupid really.
Lack of incentives led to smaller harvests.
No.
The majority of citizens opposed communism, especially the peasants whom it most affected. However, in more recent years, there has been an increased amount of nostalgia regarding communism, as some people feel that their lives were better under communism in some ways.
suffered under communism
In Communism there is no economy, as there is no money and no buying and selling. People are free to work and consume as they wish.
No, since 1989 Poland is no longer run under communism.
Abbott Laboratories operates under the mission statement that they hope to improve lives. They hope to do this by providing cost effective health care products and services.
There is no private land ownership under communism.
Command communism is when your economic system is based on communism but you are forced to experience communism; I.E. Imagine the political environment of North Korea without the ability to buy or sell because the government allocates a certain amount of goods (usually based off of a mathematical matrix) to the people. If you disagree with the concept of communism under this system, you can be jailed, exhiled, executed, etc. However, under regular communism, people are freer to choose to leave the country and/or believe in capitalism or socialism without having the fear of being jailed or executed for those beliefs.
Can people run from an ideal? But I think you meant 'Why did people fear communism?' or 'why were people suspicious of communism?' or 'why were people averse to Communism?' In the European and Asian concept- Communism equaled oppression, suppression and terror. In USSR, under Stalin Communism reached a new horror as millions were killed under his reign. Freedom died in the regime. Persecution and executions were high. In Cambodia, Communism led to a genocide where at least 10% of the population was murdered. In China, Communism equalled terror, suppression and poverty as well as persecution. (Americas) Cuba, persecution and limitation of freedom. There are many more examples of have Communism was warped into a dictatorship where horror, terror and injustice reigned supreme. Now why did Americans fear Communism? Americans were devoted to capitolism, the concept of individualism and had a strong economic status. Communism threatened to bring all of that down. Communism has never been benign. It has always led to large cases of injustices. Communism as a concept is an utopia belief, where all people are equal. A very beautiful concept but in reality it has never and will most likely never be achieved as it it is suppose to be like. The closest thing there is is social democratic societies.
Put the interests of the state before individual gain