Hydrogen is the element that is most likely to undergo nuclear fusion.
Stable. The highest binding energy is for iron and nickel, which are the least likely to undergo fission or fusion reactions
helium-4
Hydrogen and oxygen. On the sun two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom are fused at the core which keeps the suns light going and giving it more energy. The result of this is water. H2( hydrogen 2 ) O( oxygen ) h2o
Helium-4 can be a product of fusion. Hydrogen-1 cannot be produced by fusion. The uranium isotopes were probably produced by fusion in some star, long ago, and possibly not as uranium, but as something that decayed into uranium. I suppose it would be possible to produce the uranium isotopes in a lab by fusion, but I cannot imagine anyone do so, unless it was to prove a point.
Yes, nuclear fusion is considered a potentially renewable energy source because it utilizes abundant sources of fuel (such as hydrogen isotopes) that are readily available on Earth. Additionally, fusion reactions produce no greenhouse gas emissions and generate significantly more energy than traditional nuclear fission.
both
Stable. The highest binding energy is for iron and nickel, which are the least likely to undergo fission or fusion reactions
helium-4
I do not understand what you are asking because of a definition problem. A nuclear bomb can be either a fission or fusion bomb. Also a physical crash of nuclear devices is most likely to simply detonate their conventional explosives regardless of whether they are fission or fusion (although modern low shock sensitivity explosives make this less likely than it was).
Hydrogen and oxygen. On the sun two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom are fused at the core which keeps the suns light going and giving it more energy. The result of this is water. H2( hydrogen 2 ) O( oxygen ) h2o
The Sun gets its energy from nuclear fusion.The Sun gets its energy from nuclear fusion.The Sun gets its energy from nuclear fusion.The Sun gets its energy from nuclear fusion.
No, nor anywhere else on earth. Nuclear fusion is beyond our capabilities at the moment and is likely to be for several decades to come.
Problem on nuclear fusion is upon confinement of reaction in earth atmosphere. Nuclear fusion required very high temperature to initiate the reaction. Sustaining reaction is not easy. It is likely the earliest nuclear fusion will be available commercially by 2050. It is a little far future for the current energy crisis would reach it peak around 2040.
Nuclear fusion requires very high temperatures and immense pressures to start and continue. The problems with a nuclear fusion reactor would be:- 1) the high temperatures would melt the container: therefore, the reaction would have to be stored in a vacuum suspended by a magnetic field and the reactor would have to be continually cooled. 2) nuclear fusion occurs naturally in stars such as our sun: unless the fusion reaction was limited in size in some way, it would be likely that our planet is vapourised by the reaction.
Most likely because the Sun is constantly performing nuclear fusion, while Earth is not.
The most likely form of fusion to be successful on earth will be to produce helium from hydrogen isotopes. Helium has two protons and two neutrons in its nucleus.
Not necessarily. The fusion reactions in the sun produce primarily helium-4 which is stable.