0
What else can I help you with?
The greatest inaccuracy in Copernicus' model of the solar system was that the planets?
The greatest inaccuracy in Copernicus' model of the solar system was that he still believed that planets moved in perfect circles, when in fact they move in ellipses. This led to inaccuracies in predicting planetary positions.
Who thought that planets moved in little circles which moved in bigger circle?
Ancient astronomer Ptolemy proposed the geocentric model of the universe in the 2nd century AD. According to this model, planets moved in small circles called epicycles, which in turn moved in larger circles around the Earth. This theory was later replaced by the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus in the 16th century.
Why does the theory of heliocentrism overcome the problem of wandering stars?
In the old geocentric system, in which people believed what they could OBVIOUSLY see - that the Earth was standing still and the Sun, Moon and stars traveled around the Earth - everything in the sky was fine. Well, not quite; there were five things in the sky that did not behave the way they were supposed to. Those five things were "wanderers", or in the Greek, "planets". They did NOT move with the stars, the way the stars always moved. These five planets - which we now call Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn - "wandered" around the sky! Sometimes the moved quickly, sometimes slowly, and sometimes backwards from the way all the other stars behaved! Aristotle, the Greek philosopher, believed that everything moved in circles, that the Earth - Athens, in fact - was the center of everything, and that everything had its own unique "nature", and that no good could come from trying to figure out any grand principles of the universe. However, by claiming this he single-handedly stunted the development of western civilization for a thousand years. For 13 centuries after him, his pronouncements were universally accepted as truth, even though he seems to have been in error about EVERYTHING he said. So for 13 centuries after Aristotle said that EVERYTHING traveled in circles, astronomers and mathematicians tried to reconcile their observations with the Aristolean notion of circles. (Hipparchus had proposed the heliocentric concept around 130BC.) Circles within circles, or "epicycles", were one of the concepts that tried to interpret the more-and-more accurate measurements of the heavens. It finally fell to Nicolas Copernicus to broadly state the heliocentric theory, and to Johanne Keppler to propose that the planets moved in elliptical orbits rather than circular ones.
Did Ptolemy model include elliptical orbits?
No, Ptolemy's model of the universe did not include elliptical orbits. He believed that celestial bodies moved in perfect circles around the Earth. It was Johannes Kepler who later proposed elliptical orbits as the correct explanation for the motion of planets.
Who believed that planets moved in ellipses?
The first person to do this was Kepler.
What did Plato say about motion in the heaven?
Plato believed that the heavens were composed of perfect, unchanging, and eternal forms known as "perfect circles". He argued that the celestial bodies moved in a circular motion around the Earth because circles are the most perfect and divine shape.
The greatest inaccuracy in Copernicus' model of the solar system was that the planets?
The greatest inaccuracy in Copernicus' model of the solar system was that he still believed that planets moved in perfect circles, when in fact they move in ellipses. This led to inaccuracies in predicting planetary positions.
Who believed air moved objects along?
The ancient Greeks, specifically the philosopher Anaximenes, believed that air was the primary element in the universe that moved and transformed everything, including objects. This concept was part of their belief in an underlying substance called "aether" that governed the motion of all things.
Who thought that planets moved in little circles which moved in bigger circle?
Ancient astronomer Ptolemy proposed the geocentric model of the universe in the 2nd century AD. According to this model, planets moved in small circles called epicycles, which in turn moved in larger circles around the Earth. This theory was later replaced by the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus in the 16th century.
Why does the theory of heliocentrism overcome the problem of wandering stars?
In the old geocentric system, in which people believed what they could OBVIOUSLY see - that the Earth was standing still and the Sun, Moon and stars traveled around the Earth - everything in the sky was fine. Well, not quite; there were five things in the sky that did not behave the way they were supposed to. Those five things were "wanderers", or in the Greek, "planets". They did NOT move with the stars, the way the stars always moved. These five planets - which we now call Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn - "wandered" around the sky! Sometimes the moved quickly, sometimes slowly, and sometimes backwards from the way all the other stars behaved! Aristotle, the Greek philosopher, believed that everything moved in circles, that the Earth - Athens, in fact - was the center of everything, and that everything had its own unique "nature", and that no good could come from trying to figure out any grand principles of the universe. However, by claiming this he single-handedly stunted the development of western civilization for a thousand years. For 13 centuries after him, his pronouncements were universally accepted as truth, even though he seems to have been in error about EVERYTHING he said. So for 13 centuries after Aristotle said that EVERYTHING traveled in circles, astronomers and mathematicians tried to reconcile their observations with the Aristolean notion of circles. (Hipparchus had proposed the heliocentric concept around 130BC.) Circles within circles, or "epicycles", were one of the concepts that tried to interpret the more-and-more accurate measurements of the heavens. It finally fell to Nicolas Copernicus to broadly state the heliocentric theory, and to Johanne Keppler to propose that the planets moved in elliptical orbits rather than circular ones.
Why did Plato assume that the movement of the planets were along circles?
He was certain that all planets moved in a uniform, orderly manner, and his contemporaries figured that meant it had to be in circles because in circles there is no beginning and no end.
Why did early astronomers believe the geocentric model was true?
Early astronomers believed in the geocentric model because it appeared to explain the motion of celestial bodies in the sky. The model was supported by the apparent daily motion of the sun and stars around the Earth. Additionally, there was a philosophical and religious belief at the time that Earth was the center of the universe.
Did Ptolemy model include elliptical orbits?
No, Ptolemy's model of the universe did not include elliptical orbits. He believed that celestial bodies moved in perfect circles around the Earth. It was Johannes Kepler who later proposed elliptical orbits as the correct explanation for the motion of planets.
Who believed that planets moved in ellipses?
The first person to do this was Kepler.
What did Copernicus claim?
He thought that everything moved around the sun
What was Aristotle's law of motion?
Aristotle believed v = k(F/R) where speed is proportional to motive force, and inversely proportional to resistance.
With who moved from Mecca to Medina Muhammad?
His family and those few that believed and trusted in him
