This statement means that the development of an individual organism (ontogeny) summarizes the development of the entire group of organisms (phylogeny). In other words, when we look at the stages of embryonic development of a human being we can see the stages of the evolution of mammals. The embryo starts as a single cell organism, changes to multicellular, develops gill arches, a single chamber heart that changes to a multichambered heart, etc.. Evolutionists theorize that these are the same stages in evolution.
The phrase "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" suggests that the development of an individual organism (ontogeny) mirrors the evolutionary history of its species (phylogeny). In the context of language origins, this can be simplified to say that the way a child learns language reflects the stages of language development throughout human history. Essentially, individual language acquisition can echo the broader evolution of language itself.
The evolutionary history of an organism is called its ontogeny. This is a study of biology that focuses on the origin of organisms.
This is an outdated idea proposed by Ernst Haeckel, not Charles Darwin. It suggests that the stages of an organism's embryonic development mirror the evolutionary history of its species. However, this hypothesis is no longer widely accepted in modern evolutionary biology.
Not really. The phrase you are referring to is this. ' Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. ' Or, as you say, development repeats evolution. A reference to organisms going through all the ancestral evolutionary changes in their development. Which they don't. For instance, human foetuses do not have gill slits as fish do not have them. Both have pharyngeal pouches that develop into gills in fish and other jaw and throat parts in humans. So, you could more truly say, ' ontogeny creates phylogeny. '
Binomial nomenclature and phylogeny both have to do with organisms. The former refers to the modern scientist's system for naming organisms. The latter is about how an organism evolved over time.
Of common ancestry, though ontogeny does not recapitulate phylogeny, ontogeny, development, can create phylogeny.
homogeny, ontogeny, phylogeny
"Progeny recapitulate ontogeny.", meaning that children have traits of their parents and other ancestors, all the way back to when humans arose.
Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny
Ontogeny refers to the development of an individual organism from fertilization to maturity, encompassing growth and differentiation of cells. Phylogeny, on the other hand, refers to the evolutionary history and relationships among groups of organisms over time, tracing their common ancestry and evolutionary changes.
The phrase "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" suggests that the development of an individual organism (ontogeny) mirrors the evolutionary history of its species (phylogeny). In the context of language origins, this can be simplified to say that the way a child learns language reflects the stages of language development throughout human history. Essentially, individual language acquisition can echo the broader evolution of language itself.
" Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. " Ernst Haeckel. Now considered incorrect.
"Progeny recapitulate ontogeny.", meaning that children have traits of their parents and other ancestors, all the way back to when humans arose.When Lily met Joseph, she tried hard to recapitulate the hour-long lecture into the 15 minutes that the two could spend together.
The evolutionary history of an organism is called its ontogeny. This is a study of biology that focuses on the origin of organisms.
The history of genealogical development; the race history of an animal or vegetable type; the historic exolution of the phylon or tribe, in distinction from ontogeny, or the development of the individual organism, and from biogenesis, or life development generally.
she tried hard to recapitulate the hour-long lecture into the 15 minutes
Haz. Ibn-e-Abbas (RAA). has said that a Guardian (Wali) is one by seeing him one could recapitulate almighty Allah.