At a very rough guess the same reason we don't enter the sun even though gravity pulls us:
The speed and direction of the electron is maintained while the opposite change has a strong enough magnetic effect to stop it from escaping.
Yes, though interestingly the probability density for finding an s orbital electron is actually higher in the nucleus than anywhere else (this assumes the nucleus and electron are point masses; in reality, they aren't, so it doesn't quite work out that way in the real world).
A common misconception is that proton 1 in the nucleus attracts electron 1 in the orbitals, proton 2 attracts electron 2, etc. This is very, very wrong: every proton attracts every electron all at once. Further electrons, as in beyond the neutral charge, are attracted in the same way as all other electrons, and held subject to a) repulsion and shielding from other electrons and b) remaing gaps in orbitals to fit them.
Rutherford's key discovery was that the atom has a small, positively charged nucleus and is mostly empty space. Thomson discovered the electron and proposed the "plum pudding" model of the atom, in which electrons were embedded in a positively charged sphere.
A nucleus is densely pack and positively charged because it is made up of protons and neutrons. But the entire atom is not charged (unless it is an ion) because the number of protons is equal to the number of electrons not in the nucleus. The electrons are actually really far away from the nucleus, so the charges are kept very separate in the atom, though all together the atom is neutral.
The space between the atomic nucleus and the electron cloud is primarily filled with empty space. This empty space allows for electrons to move about freely and occupy different energy levels within the electron cloud.
Yes, though interestingly the probability density for finding an s orbital electron is actually higher in the nucleus than anywhere else (this assumes the nucleus and electron are point masses; in reality, they aren't, so it doesn't quite work out that way in the real world).
A common misconception is that proton 1 in the nucleus attracts electron 1 in the orbitals, proton 2 attracts electron 2, etc. This is very, very wrong: every proton attracts every electron all at once. Further electrons, as in beyond the neutral charge, are attracted in the same way as all other electrons, and held subject to a) repulsion and shielding from other electrons and b) remaing gaps in orbitals to fit them.
Even though an oxygen atom is electrically neutral, since it has equal numbers of protons and electrons, it can still act as though it is positively charged, because the electrons are very mobile and they arrange themselves in a way that maximizes their connection to the nucleus while minimizing their connection to other electrons, which repel them. So when an oxygen atom adds an electron, that electron is attracted by the positive nucleus more than it is repelled by the negative electrons orbiting the nucleus. The separation between the electron and the nucleus is a form of potential energy, just as you gain potential energy by raising an object in a gravitational field. As the electron falls toward the nucleus, potential energy is converted into other energy, such as heat or light.
The attraction is called an electrostatic attraction. It occurs between two oppositely charged ions, with one ion donating an electron (cation) and the other ion accepting an electron (anion) to form a stable ionic bond.
the electron, though any charged particle can create a flowing current.
Rutherford's key discovery was that the atom has a small, positively charged nucleus and is mostly empty space. Thomson discovered the electron and proposed the "plum pudding" model of the atom, in which electrons were embedded in a positively charged sphere.
In fact an electron has no valency, though it is equal to a -1 (minus one) charged anion like Cl-, having a valency of -1
Though the electron itself is not present in the nucleus of an atom, the elementary particles that make up the electron are present inside the neutron. In other words, a neutron is made up of an electron and a proton. How do we know this? Because when a neutron decays, it slowly decays into a proton and an electron. It's a cycle.
Yes, though interestingly the probability density for finding an s orbital electron is actually higher in the nucleus than anywhere else (this assumes the nucleus and electron are point masses; in reality, they aren't, so it doesn't quite work out that way in the real world).
A nucleus is densely pack and positively charged because it is made up of protons and neutrons. But the entire atom is not charged (unless it is an ion) because the number of protons is equal to the number of electrons not in the nucleus. The electrons are actually really far away from the nucleus, so the charges are kept very separate in the atom, though all together the atom is neutral.
Though the nucleus gives out electrons as beta particles in the phenomenon of beta decay, nucleus does not have electron within. Then how could an electron come out? This is actually an interesting question. A neutron is capable of decaying into a proton and an electron along with a formation of anti neutrino. This electron comes out as beta particle.
Electrons, which are a type of fermion, orbit the nucleus of atoms. Remember, though, that they do not actually orbit or "move around" the nucleus, but instead are in a superposition of states, which we usually describe as an electron density, or the probability of locating an electron at a certain distance and time.