Becuase the animals' body that your cloning, their organs will be the same in the new animal, the same age as well. For instance, a sheep was cloned and the new sheeps' organs were the same age (old) as the sheep that it had been cloned from.
Human cloning and animal cloning both involve creating a genetic copy of an organism, but there are differences in the ethical and legal considerations surrounding each. Human cloning raises complex ethical issues related to human rights and medical ethics, while animal cloning is primarily focused on agricultural and scientific applications. Additionally, the technologies and procedures used for human cloning may differ from those used for animal cloning.
If u ask the churches and priests about that,they will ban u because cloning is very bad. It depends to the belief of a people.
Cloning is controlled to prevent ethical concerns such as exploitation of cloned organisms, potential harm to biodiversity, and misuse of genetic technology. Regulation ensures that cloning is conducted safely and responsibly under strict oversight.
People in California did not vote to ban cloning because they may have believed in the potential benefits of cloning technology for medical and scientific advancements. Additionally, ethical concerns about restricting research and innovation in the state may have played a role in the decision.
Because they don't understand it. It is a complex issue, surrounded on all sides by ignorant people with imaginary axes to grind, and a wonderful way to distract people from the real problems we face.
Muslim people along with Christians and Jewish people consider cloning a taboo, and forbid it.
Some people object to cloning because it allows scientists to "act like God" in the manipulation of living organisms.
Opinions on cloning are diverse and vary among individuals and groups. Some people support cloning for medical research, while others have ethical concerns about the implications of cloning on identity, genetic diversity, and the sanctity of life. Overall, public opinion on cloning is not uniform and can depend on specific contexts and applications.
As far as is known no human cloning has taken place. Yet.
people like mushoe pork on wensdays The, "Stop Cloning Act" of 1997
Human cloning and animal cloning both involve creating a genetic copy of an organism, but there are differences in the ethical and legal considerations surrounding each. Human cloning raises complex ethical issues related to human rights and medical ethics, while animal cloning is primarily focused on agricultural and scientific applications. Additionally, the technologies and procedures used for human cloning may differ from those used for animal cloning.
Cloning is the process of creating an identical copy of an organism or individual. People may be upset about cloning for various reasons, including ethical concerns about interfering with nature, fears about the potential misuse of cloning technology, and issues related to the welfare of cloned animals. Additionally, there are concerns about the implications of cloning for genetic diversity and the impact it could have on larger ecosystems.
cose their fools
No one.
Opinions on cloning vary among people. Some see it as a scientific advancement with the potential to benefit society by helping in medical research and organ transplantation. Others have ethical concerns about the implications of human cloning and the potential for misuse.
Many people have a personal opinion on cloning. Most people do not think it is a good idea and there has even been a bill known as the Human Cloning prohibition Act made to Congress but was rejected. It was re-introduced again in May 2013.
Cloning humans raises ethical concerns and challenges around individuality, identity, and potential exploitation. Additionally, there are unresolved scientific and technical challenges, such as high rates of failure and health risks for the cloned individual. Overall, the ethical and practical implications of human cloning outweigh any potential benefits.