You suppose reality is made up of individual bits of "matter" called "atoms"? And that these things can not exist in of themselves (free state)? The more powerful question you should be asking is, "why do scientists believe matter can be created and/or destroyed", when that violates their own laws of thermodynamics that state matter can not be created and/or destroyed? You also need to ask, "why do we still believe in matter/atom concept?", when it is clear mainstream mathematical physics has made the concept of matter/atom too complex to understand?
Noble gases have completely filled orbitals. They are stable, chemically inert, do not generally form compounds and hence exist as isolated atoms.
Examples of elements that exist as free metal in nature include gold, silver, and copper. These elements are often found in their metallic form in the Earth's crust and are relatively unreactive.
potassium is a natural element and found inn several minerals in earth . but it can not exist free in nature.
Most elements are sufficiently reactive so it can not exist in elemental form.
Most atoms are found in chemical compounds or bonded to other atoms, as opposed to existing in a free state. Atoms are constantly interacting with other atoms through chemical bonds to form molecules. However, certain noble gases, such as helium and neon, can exist in a relatively stable and unreactive free state.
bcz their energy is low thats why they can exist independently while the energy of some atoms is so high that they can only exist as ions or molecuoles not as free atoms
You suppose reality is made up of individual bits of "matter" called "atoms"? And that these things can not exist in of themselves (free state)? The more powerful question you should be asking is, "why do scientists believe matter can be created and/or destroyed", when that violates their own laws of thermodynamics that state matter can not be created and/or destroyed? You also need to ask, "why do we still believe in matter/atom concept?", when it is clear mainstream mathematical physics has made the concept of matter/atom too complex to understand?
as, u all know element's exist in a free state in nature, like gold, in same way the atoms exists independently in nature, as, they are only the smallest particle no, more further can be divide, so, as, it is independent in nature.
Yes, it does not exist free in nature.
Question as posed makes no sense. Free? In nature? If so, no.
All elements and compounds are present in molecular state. They cannot be found as individual atoms. Atoms cannot exist in free state.
All elements and compounds are present in molecular state. They cannot be found as individual atoms. Atoms cannot exist in free state.
Noble gases have completely filled orbitals. They are stable, chemically inert, do not generally form compounds and hence exist as isolated atoms.
Because that is the nature of liquidity.
Examples of elements that exist as free metal in nature include gold, silver, and copper. These elements are often found in their metallic form in the Earth's crust and are relatively unreactive.
potassium is a natural element and found inn several minerals in earth . but it can not exist free in nature.