It was not a "law". It was considered a theory. All theories are best guesses using all known information until further information comes along. Gravity is a theory.
Bohr's model of the atom was widely accepted because it successfully explained the spectral lines of hydrogen, which previous models could not. Additionally, his model provided a visual representation of electron energy levels and orbits, making it easier for scientists to understand and work with. Furthermore, the model could be used to predict and explain other phenomena in atomic structure.
One reason people didn't initially believe Wegener's continental drift theory was the lack of a mechanism to explain how continents could move. The theory was also considered radical and contradicted the established belief that continents were fixed in place. Additionally, Wegener's evidence, while compelling, was not widely accepted at the time due to the limited understanding of plate tectonics.
Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift was not initially accepted because he lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, his evidence was considered insufficient and geologists at that time did not believe that continents could drift over time. It was not until the theory of plate tectonics was developed in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
People didn't believe the theory of continental drift initially because Wegener's evidence was not widely accepted at the time, and he didn't have a satisfactory explanation for the mechanism of how continents could move. The scientific community also lacked the technology to fully understand plate tectonics until later developments in the mid-20th century.
His idea was not accepted because people back then did not believe that the plates could move. They also thought you could fall off the Earth but that is a different question. The theory was put forward first by Abraham Orthelius but was fully developed by Alfred Wegner. His theory was not thought of because people thought it was not possible for the tectonic plates of the earth to move.
Nature could be explained through abstract reasoning and experimentation.
Greek myths explained things that the Greeks could not explain scientifically. They explained how the seasons and the earth worked. They explained how the world began, who was in control, and why there was good and bad luck.
Bohr's model of the atom was widely accepted because it successfully explained the spectral lines of hydrogen, which previous models could not. Additionally, his model provided a visual representation of electron energy levels and orbits, making it easier for scientists to understand and work with. Furthermore, the model could be used to predict and explain other phenomena in atomic structure.
In the Periodic Table, a period would be a horizontal row, so named because it was noticed that as the atomic number increased, the elements would periodically evidence similar chemical properties and could thus could be grouped in a way that manifest these similarities. This quality is explained by how electrons fill their orbitals as you progress across the period; elements in the columns having some chemical similarites to others in their column.
yes there are liquid metals on the periodic table. for example mercury
He explained his policies and assured people that he could help through the depression
In ancient Greece the Gods and Goddess' explained what the ancients could not. Poseidon explained why the sea has hurricanes, etc.
People could argue that some things can't be explained so are therefore explained with things such as magic. So the answer to this question is there is no answer.
He explained his policies and assured people that he could help them through the DepressionAPEX
In the equation of a periodic motion it could represent the amplitude, frequency or phase.
He explained his policies and assured people that he could help them through the DepressionAPEX
One reason people didn't initially believe Wegener's continental drift theory was the lack of a mechanism to explain how continents could move. The theory was also considered radical and contradicted the established belief that continents were fixed in place. Additionally, Wegener's evidence, while compelling, was not widely accepted at the time due to the limited understanding of plate tectonics.