In Kobe there were two sorts of Buildings,
the older ones,
and the newer ones
The older ones were made mostly of just wood, and therefore werent very sturdy and burned very easily too. Which made them easy targets for the earthquake, and the post-earthquake fires.
However the newer ones were built with earthquakes in mind, and were made with steel frames, and extra support (etc.) unlike the older wooden houses. This made them harder to burn or knock down.
Although, some weren't as 'earthquake-proof' as thought and did fall down as well. But the majority of the newer buildings managed to survive the earthquake
Earthquake proof buildings are not common worldwide due to the high costs associated with their construction. In areas with frequent earthquakes, like Japan and California, there is more incentive to invest in earthquake resistant technology. Additionally, building codes and regulations in these regions often require construction to meet certain seismic standards.
No, most buildings around the world are not earthquake-proof. Many older buildings were not designed to withstand strong earthquakes, and building codes and construction standards vary widely between regions, leading to some buildings being more vulnerable to seismic activity than others. Upgrading existing buildings to be more earthquake-resistant and enforcing strict building codes for new construction can help mitigate this risk.
Circular buildings can be safe in an earthquake-prone area if they are designed to be resilient to seismic forces. Engineers can incorporate features like reinforced foundations, flexible construction materials, and dampers to absorb vibrations. Proper design and construction techniques are critical to ensure the structural integrity and safety of circular buildings during earthquakes.
Yes, it is possible to build earthquake-resistant buildings by using appropriate engineering techniques and materials. Some strategies include incorporating flexible foundations, installing bracing systems, and using steel frames or reinforced concrete. Designing buildings to withstand lateral forces, such as those caused by seismic activity, is essential in earthquake-prone regions.
Daring an earthquake, the ground shakes, twists, and heaves, causing buildings to move. Houses can shift on their foundations, crack, and tumble to the ground. Some buildings, however, are built to withstand violent earthquakes. Some are also braced with special materials to keep them standing.
Buildings that were retrofitted to withstand earthquakes or those built with seismic design features were more likely to survive the Kobe earthquake. On the other hand, older buildings or structures that were poorly constructed were more susceptible to damage or collapse. Additionally, the soil composition and proximity to the fault line also played a role in determining which buildings survived and which did not.
People were homeless and some died
To prepare for the Kobe Earthquake, people conducted earthquake drills, reinforced buildings, secured heavy furniture, and stocked up on emergency supplies such as food, water, and first aid kits. Some individuals also participated in community-based disaster preparedness programs and learned about evacuation routes.
1906 San Francisco earthquake. Damage still can be seen on some older buildings.
People live in Kobe after the earthquake because they believe that the impacts of future earthquakes will be reduced. They think this because they have been introduced to the 'Earthquake Emergency Plan'.
people died of a 5m wall of fire and the weight of topperling buildings killed a large amount if you want to know more copy and paste this into the address box (: http://www.sln.org.uk/geography/enquiry/we39.htm
Earthquake proof buildings are not common worldwide due to the high costs associated with their construction. In areas with frequent earthquakes, like Japan and California, there is more incentive to invest in earthquake resistant technology. Additionally, building codes and regulations in these regions often require construction to meet certain seismic standards.
kill yourself cause you ain't getting out of it or survive
No, most buildings around the world are not earthquake-proof. Many older buildings were not designed to withstand strong earthquakes, and building codes and construction standards vary widely between regions, leading to some buildings being more vulnerable to seismic activity than others. Upgrading existing buildings to be more earthquake-resistant and enforcing strict building codes for new construction can help mitigate this risk.
I know one lab you can do. You will need blocks and a wobbly table. This lab is kind of mediocre, but it is a good way to learn about earthquake-resistant structures. basically, you build buildings and shake the table. The tall buildings will fall but the low buildings are just slightly harmed.
Approximately 30,000 buildings were fully destroyed; buildings with partial damage that had to be demolished counted for some 68,000.
some building weren't built up to standard to they weren't that strong and broke when a earthquake happened