The observer of living cells, Robert Hooke, did not propose that cells were the unit of life primarily because, at the time, the understanding of cell function and Biology was limited. Hooke's observations were largely structural, focusing on the cell walls of cork without recognizing their role in metabolism or reproduction. The concept of cells as the fundamental unit of life was later developed by scientists like Schleiden and Schwann, who integrated advancements in microscopy and cell theory.
The observer of these cells may not have suggested they were the unit of life due to limited understanding of cellular functions and processes at the time. Early cell theory was still developing, and the complexity of life was not fully appreciated, leading to misconceptions about the role and significance of cells. Additionally, the observer might have lacked the evidence or tools to demonstrate that cells were the fundamental building blocks of all living organisms.
Living things have an active metabolism, which involves the series of chemical reactions that occur within cells to maintain life. Non-living things do not have a metabolism as they do not possess cells or the ability to carry out these chemical reactions.
Someone without any cells wouldn't be able to live because everything in you is made up of cells.
The cell theory, which states that all living things are composed of cells, that cells are the basic unit of life, and that all cells arise from pre-existing cells, was primarily developed by scientists such as Matthias Schleiden, Theodor Schwann, and Rudolf Virchow. However, scientists like Aristotle and other early philosophers, while influential in biology, did not contribute to the formulation of the cell theory. Their ideas were based on earlier notions of life and did not include the cell as a fundamental unit.
Yes,they have ribosomes.Almost every cell have them.
The observer of these cells may not have suggested they were the unit of life due to limited understanding of cellular functions and processes at the time. Early cell theory was still developing, and the complexity of life was not fully appreciated, leading to misconceptions about the role and significance of cells. Additionally, the observer might have lacked the evidence or tools to demonstrate that cells were the fundamental building blocks of all living organisms.
They breath air if you didnt breath then your are not living :d
They breath air if you didnt breath then your are not living :d
They breath air if you didnt breath then your are not living :d
no she didnt
Living things have an active metabolism, which involves the series of chemical reactions that occur within cells to maintain life. Non-living things do not have a metabolism as they do not possess cells or the ability to carry out these chemical reactions.
that they didnt know cures for dieseeses or they didnt know they had dieseeses
they didnt
Someone without any cells wouldn't be able to live because everything in you is made up of cells.
she didnt
Skin cells make our skin and skin protects us from dirt and germs getting directly into our body, and cells allow us to be here for if we didnt have cells we wouldn't exist
well if we didnt have cells then we would not exist. cells are what make up every fiber of our being. and not just ours. every single organism out there has cells. they are the "building blocks of life"