Elephants need less energy because less of their body is exposeded to the cold
2 lbs is a little less than 1 kilo
Cooler particles have less kinetic energy.
Generally, higher energy levels are less abundant than lower energy levels. This is because higher energy levels require more energy input to reach and maintain, so they are less commonly found in nature compared to lower energy levels that are more stable and prevalent.
ADP has less potential energy than ATP has. In fact, there are 7.3 kc less energy in ADP than in ATP.
No, an object will not be a net radiator of energy when its thermal energy is less than that of its surroundings. In this case, the object will instead absorb thermal energy from its surroundings in an attempt to reach thermal equilibrium.
it moves a lot less then a mouse
It depends largely on what it's a kilo of--a kilo of brick dust is much less expensive than a kilo of steel, which is less expensive than a kilo of uranium.
Yes, it is less than a kilo. There are 1000 grams in a kilo, so 360 grams is just over 1/3rd of a kilo.
A micro is less.
This is usually very cheap, $0.03-$0.08 or even less
i believe less
There are not that many elephants left. There used to be 5 million elephants. Now there are less than 400,000 in Africa.
It's simply a shorthand way of expressing large measurements. It takes less less ink (and less energy) to write or type millimetre - than 'millionth of a metre'.
Elephants are less hairy than mammoths and do not posses such large tusks. Elephants are not extinct, while mammoths are.
More ;]
No it does not.
There is 1000 grams in a kilo. Ergo 500 grams in half a kilo. It does not matter whether it is half a kilo of sugar or half a kilo of snow. By using less of this stuff your math (not meth) might improve. There is a lot to gain by not doing drugs.