Popular physicists are liable to go into "spontaneous symmetry breaking." The truth is that standard physical models are often just math without genuine physics. Until now, we have not been able to explain exponential decay so much as describe it. But I believe I have cracked the code. See the included link.
I really believe I have an original answer, and I want to make it known.
Some isotopes are stable, others are unstable.
Isotopes with a high atomic number and/or an unstable ratio of protons to neutrons are more likely to decay. Generally, isotopes further from the line of stability on the periodic table are more likely to undergo radioactive decay.
"Daughter isotopes" are called the decay products of an radioactive isotope.
The process is called decay, or sometimes nuclear decay. A link can be found below.
Neptunium-237 decay to protactinium-233.Other isotopes of Np decay to other daughter isotopes.
Exponential Decay. hope this will help :)
Temperature Radio Active decay interest % population % Projectile of a ball exponential decay or growth depreciation %
Exponential growth is when the amount of something is increasing, and exponential decay is when the amount of something is decreasing.
They are incredibly different acceleration patterns. Exponential growth is unbounded, whereas exponential decay is bounded so as to form a "dynamic equilibrium." This is why exponential decay is so typical of natural processes. To see work I have done in explaining exponential decay, go to the page included in the related links.
No, the equation y = 102x is not exponential. An exponential function is of the form y = a * b^x, where a and b are constants. In this case, the equation y = 102x is a linear function, as it represents a straight line with a slope of 102 and no exponential growth or decay.
Exponential growth has a growth/decay factor (or percentage decimal) greater than 1. Decay has a decay factor less than 1.
A linear function grows ( or shrinks) at a constant rate called its slope.An exponential function grows ( or shrinks) at a rate which increases(or decreases)over time. From a practical standpoint linear growth (or shrinkage) is simple and predictable. Exponential growth is essentially out of control and unsustainableand exponential decay soon becomes negligible.if y=az + b then y is a linear function of z. If y=aebz then y is an exponential function of z. If y= acbz then y is still an exponential function of z because you can substitute c=ek (so that k=logec) to give you y=aekbz .
Exponential growth goes infinitely up. Exponential decay goes infinitely over always getting closer to the x axis but never reaching it. ADDED: An exponential decay trace's flat-looking region has its own special name: an "asymptote".
That all depends on the problem given!A general form of the exponential growth/decay is:y = ab^x.If we have an exponential growth, b = 1 + rOtherwise, b = 1 - r.In the second version, the exponential growth is y = Ae^(kt) while the exponential decay is y = Ae^(-kt)
Yes.
The decay products of ununhexium (after alpha decay) are isotopes of ununquadium.
No, most isotopes are not stable. Many isotopes are radioactive and decay over time, releasing radiation in the process. Only a few isotopes are stable and do not undergo radioactive decay.