Mount Rainier has a history of producing enormous mudflows called lahars. Rainier could produce such alarge lahar in two ways. First, even a relatively small eruption could melt part of the large snow pack at the mountain's summer. The water would then mix with ash and soil. It is also possible that acidic gasses have broken down rocks in the volcano into clay. If the summit fails during an earthquake or an eruption it could also trigger a mudflow. If alahar similar to the ones that have happened in the past were to occur, it could bury much of Tacoma and and clog rivers, causing them to flood Seattle.
Oh, dude, Shishaldin Volcano is a volcano, not a serial killer. It hasn't killed anyone recently that I know of. Like, sure, it can be dangerous with eruptions and stuff, but it's not out there hunting people down. So, like, zero people killed by Shishaldin Volcano.
The most deadly volcano in recorded history is Mount Tambora in Indonesia, which erupted in 1815, killing around 71,000 people. The eruption had far-reaching global effects, causing the "year without a summer" in 1816 due to the amount of ash and sulfur dioxide released into the atmosphere.
there are thousand of Population around the Krakatoa Volcano. i was there with my on eyes
how many people got killed in a volcano
Mount Rainier was discovered by the Meso-Indian people of the Narfal Islands in their second exploration of the pacific northwest (assumed to have been around 200 AD). The initial belief, according to the cuniform of this tribe, is that Mount Rainier was nonexistent before 150 AD, causing geological historians to infer that massive geothermal events allowed Mount Rainier into existence. The mythological aspect to the mountain is that deep beneath the surface, lies a tunnel/staircase with conditions suitable to humans leading to the center of the earth. This Meso-Indian assumption has neither been proven nor disproven, but recently, a series of mini-earthquakes have led scientists to believe that there very well could be some sort of cave or even "tunnel" toward the center of the mountain.
They did consider them dangerous but not always consider them evil.
beru has the most dangerous volcano. killed over 20,000 people in the last hour
floods, storms, droughts,.......
The Kileua volcano in Hawaii was recently listed in this spot, though many people think this is an odd choice. Here's a link to the Top Ten Dangerous Volcanoes, too.
I think it is dangerous because it is a volcano. The last eruption was in 1911, and people are unsure wether it is still active.
Volcanos contribute to global warming.
Oh, dude, Shishaldin Volcano is a volcano, not a serial killer. It hasn't killed anyone recently that I know of. Like, sure, it can be dangerous with eruptions and stuff, but it's not out there hunting people down. So, like, zero people killed by Shishaldin Volcano.
Yes. Dormant volcanoes such as Mount Rainier and Mount Kilimanjaro are popular climbing destinations. Vulcanologists will sometimes climb active volcanoes to study them.
About 1,0000 people live near mount rainier some people even work near it.
This is mostly based on two factors: Activity: How often and with what intensity the volcano erupts Location: Where the volcano is geographically located If a volcano is very active, but is located in the middle of the ocean, few people are affected by it, so the volcano isn't considered dangerous to society. If it is very active and near civilization, then it's pretty dangerous. if it's not very active and near civilization, you might want to keep an eye out on it. If it's not very active and in the middle of nowhere, it's not particularly dangerous
It can be yes, but it is not likely to couse fatalities because of the extremely tight security in the area of the volcano.
This can be a very opinion-based question. Some people consider Facebook dangerous due to stalking reasons, others consider it dangerous for people's social lives. There is no real agreed upon answer of why some people just do not like Facebook in general.