answersLogoWhite

0

Scientists encourage other scientists so that all scientists can get the most accurate answer to all questions

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Scientist encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become?

more robust and reliable. By having other scientists review and repeat their experiments, researchers can ensure the validity and accuracy of their results. This process of peer review and replication helps to strengthen the scientific community's confidence in the findings and conclusions drawn from the research.


What is it called when scientists do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance?

Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become


Scientist encourage other scientist to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypothesis may become?

supported by enough data to become a theory.


Why do scientists need to become keen observer?

Scientists need to be keen observers to gather accurate data, notice patterns, and make meaningful connections in their research. By carefully observing the natural world, scientists can uncover new insights, ask important questions, and develop hypotheses to test in their experiments. Being a keen observer is crucial for making discoveries and advancing scientific knowledge.


In what way are scientific theories connected to observations and evidence?

Scientific theories are connected to observations and evidence through the process of hypothesis testing. Scientists use observations and evidence to develop hypotheses, which are then tested through experiments and further observations. If the results support the hypothesis, it can become a theory. Theories are constantly refined and updated based on new evidence and observations.


Why don't scientists say they have proven their hypothesis?

Scientists believe that experiments can test hypotheses and answer the specific scientific question at hand and can either support or deny the justification of a theory. Either way, the theory will always have outliers and cases that reduce its legitimacy. While a theory can become very strong in its support, scientists say that nothing can ever be 100% "proven"


. A scientific hypothesis can become a theory if?

A scientific hypothesis can become a theory if the hypothesis is tested extensively and competing hypotheses are eliminated.


What is the definition of Research in the scientific method?

A process in which scientists father facts through observations and formulate scientific hypotheses that may eventually become theories.


Why are hypothesis never accepted by scientist?

Hypotheses are ideas which are, as yet, unsupported by evidence. As a hypothesis becomes backed up by mathematical formulae and observational data, it may, if it is sound, become a theory. All scientific theories began life as hypotheses, it is merely a case of which hypotheses become theories, and which fall down by the wayside after being discredited or having lacked support.


Did dr josef mengele become insane with his experiments?

no


Was a nineteenth-century monk whose hypotheses about inheritance in pea plants have become scientific laws?

who was a nineteenth century monk whose hypotheses about inheritance in pea plants have became scientific laws


Was a nineteenth century monk whose hypotheses about inheritance in pea plants have become scientific laws?

who was a nineteenth century monk whose hypotheses about inheritance in pea plants have became scientific laws