answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

Two scientists do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. What is the most likely outcome of their disagreement A. More studies will take place on the issue B. Some decre?

A. More studies will take place on the issue. Disagreements between scientists often lead to further research as they seek to gather more data, refine methodologies, and test different hypotheses. This additional research can help clarify the environmental impacts of various grocery bag types and contribute to a more informed consensus.


Why is molecular modeling important?

Molecular modeling can improve our lives by: a.) Allowing scientists to have the ability to design new and more potent drugs to use in the fight against various diseases. b.) Scientists will be able to use this knowledge to develop systems that can carry out artificial photosynthesis.


What is benefits of fracking?

Hydraulic Fracturing will allow America to produce more fuel domestically, thereby reducing our dependence on foreign oil. Additionally, fracking is one of the most popular way of producing natural gas, which can be used to power vehicles. Natural Gas vehicles produce 90% fewer emissions than cars powered by gasoline. Personally I think that if wells are drilled properly there isn't any cause for concern about damage to the environment. Source: http://www.hydraulicfracturing.com


Did scientists fake the results of global warming?

No, the overwhelming consensus among scientists is that global warming is occurring and is primarily caused by human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels. Multiple studies from different scientific institutions around the world have confirmed this finding.


Why is it important for scientists to use a standard system of measurement?

Using a standard system of measurement ensures consistency and accuracy in scientific experiments and observations. It allows for effective communication of results among scientists worldwide and facilitates comparisons between studies. Standardized measurements also help prevent errors and misunderstandings in data analysis and interpretation.

Related Questions

What are the advantages of fracking?

creats more jobs


Who studies medicine?

Scientists study medicine. To be more specific, Doctors and Nurses do.


What type of scientist studies fish?

Ichthyologists are scientists that study fish


What are the positives of fracking?

Well simply it is a new source of oil/gas, that we have plenty of. It will mean that when we run out of oil from traps (the current way to get oil) we will have enough oil and gas to last us another 50 or more years (this is an estimate and to be truthful we still have know idea how much oil is available from fracking). Fracking will open up a load of new jobs. However this will just replace the old jobs of conventional oil/gas extraction. At first fracking will make oil and gas cheaper in the market. This is because if there is more oil there is less demand for it so prices go down. However when oil from fracking runs out, then we will be back at the same step as we are now. Fracking is not as bad as people make it out to be - if it is monitored and regulated. The only problem is who is going to do that, because at the moment it is done by the fracking companies. Do we know if they are telling the truth? For them profit is more important than the environment. However in my opinion I am still against fracking. And it is not water pollution and earthquakes that bother me but the environmental horizon if we choose to take the path of fracking (continuing to do fracking in America or starting to frack in the UK). The oil and gas from fracking is the same as it is from conventional oil extraction methods. I believe that fracking will become another excuse to look away from turning to eco-friendly energy sources. Fracking may become another short term cop-out for the government's energy crisis but in the long term it is just destroying the environment with global warming. Sorry if the last question was off topic but I wanted to give another view to the truth of fracking.


Which city would most likely be the epicenter of an earthquake San Francisco California or St. Paul Minnesota?

At one time I would have said San Francisco, but with oil fracking now it would be Minnesota. Today Oklahoma has more earthquakes than California because of fracking.


Two scientists do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. What is the most likely outcome of their disagreement A.More studies will take place on the issue B.Some decre?

A. More studies will take place on the issue.


What elements are mercury made up of?

Scientists do not yet know if Mercury has the element Mercury in it, they need further studies. AKA they have to get more "inside" of Mercury.


Two scientists do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. What is the most likely outcome of their disagreement A. More studies will take place on the issue B. Some decre?

A. More studies will take place on the issue. Disagreements between scientists often lead to further research as they seek to gather more data, refine methodologies, and test different hypotheses. This additional research can help clarify the environmental impacts of various grocery bag types and contribute to a more informed consensus.


Are teens more into fashion or studies?

both studies and fashions but more priority is given to studies


Which city most likely be the epicenter of an earthquake San Francisco California or St. Paul Minnesota?

At one time I would have said San Francisco, but with oil fracking now it would be Minnesota. Today Oklahoma has more earthquakes than California because of fracking.


What do you call a scientists who studies snakes?

Ophiology is the study of snakes whereas Herpetology is the study of snakes and many other reptiles


What do modern scientists use in classifying organisms that Linnaeus did not use?

Modern scientists use genetic sequencing, molecular studies, and evolutionary relationships to classify organisms, techniques that Linnaeus did not have access to. These methods provide a more accurate and detailed understanding of the relationships between different species.