To have double security!!
Nucleotides do not have DNA or RNA. DNA and RNA are composed of nucleotides.
Uracil is a nucleotide found in RNA but not in DNA. In RNA, uracil replaces thymine, which is found in DNA.
DNA --> RNA --> Proteins -----------------------------------------That simple.
Uracil
RNA polymerase is the enzyme responsible for binding to DNA and synthesizing a complementary RNA strand during transcription.
They need either DNA or RNA.
When making DNA preparation why do you need RNA? :P Ya it is done because it may interfere with your next experiments.
RNA doesn't need proteins nor does it need DNA. RNA probably came first. And it is known that RNA can form peptide bonds which can make proteins. DNA would have come later. They don't need each other, from an evolutionary standpoint. Modern DNA and RNA and proteins are interlocked, but earlier forms clearly weren't.
The enzyme that transcribes the DNA into RNA is called RNA polymerase.
Nucleotides do not have DNA or RNA. DNA and RNA are composed of nucleotides.
An uracil base is in RNA but not in DNA
RNA has the base uracil that DNA does not have.
Yes, DNA and RNA have different sugar . DNA contains deoxyribose sugar whereas RNA consists of ribose sugar, which are completely different from each other.
Comparing DNA and RNA, some key differences include: DNA is double-stranded, while RNA is single-stranded; DNA contains deoxyribose sugar, RNA contains ribose sugar; DNA has thymine base, RNA has uracil base; DNA is found in the nucleus, RNA is found in the cytoplasm; DNA is stable, RNA is less stable; DNA is the genetic material, RNA is involved in protein synthesis. These are just a few of the many distinctions between DNA and RNA.
Ribosomal RNA
Uracil is a nucleotide found in RNA but not in DNA. In RNA, uracil replaces thymine, which is found in DNA.
No... DNA is much longer than RNA.