The Bohr Model of a single-electron atom assumes that the energy levels of electron orbits are fixed due to the quantization of angular momentum of the electron while in orbit.
The problem occurs because angular momentum depends on both the radius of the orbit and the velocity of the electron in that orbit. If one or the other is uncertain, then it is impossible to know the angular momentum.
Heisenberg showed that either one or the other MUST be uncertain. If we are certain about the radius, we MUST have uncertainty about the velocity -- and vice-versa.
Thus, angular momentum of an orbting electron can NOT be quantized, because it can not be known.
The principle that goes against the concept of Bohr's fixed orbits is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. This principle states that it is impossible to simultaneously know both the exact position and momentum of a particle, such as an electron in an atom. Bohr's model assumes that electrons can occupy fixed orbits with precise positions and momenta, which contradicts the uncertainty principle. As a result, more advanced quantum mechanical models, like the Schrödinger equation, provide a better description of electron behavior in atoms.
No, electrons do not move in orbits like planets around the sun. Instead, they exist in probabilistic cloud-like regions called orbitals, where their exact position is not precisely defined. This behavior is described by quantum mechanics, which contrasts with the classical mechanics governing planetary motion. While orbits imply a defined path, electrons are better understood in terms of their wave-like properties and the uncertainty principle.
Stationary orbits of an atom refer to the specific energy levels that electrons can occupy around the nucleus without emitting or absorbing energy. These orbits are defined by the quantized energy levels in which electrons can orbit the nucleus. The concept of stationary orbits forms the basis of Bohr's model of the atom.
Niels Bohr called the orbits "stationary states" because in these states, electrons do not emit electromagnetic radiation or lose energy, resulting in stable orbits. These stationary states are characterized by specific energy levels, and transitions between these states result in quantized energy exchanges. This concept helped explain the stability of the atom and laid the foundation for quantum mechanics.
The principle of inertia, proposed by Galileo, was unknown in Copernicus's time but later made it possible to explain how the Earth orbits the Sun. Inertia states that an object in motion will stay in motion unless acted upon by an external force, which helped to understand how the Earth moves around the Sun in the absence of a visible force pushing it.
The principle that goes against the concept of Bohr's fixed orbits is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. This principle states that it is impossible to simultaneously know both the exact position and momentum of a particle, such as an electron in an atom. Bohr's model assumes that electrons can occupy fixed orbits with precise positions and momenta, which contradicts the uncertainty principle. As a result, more advanced quantum mechanical models, like the Schrödinger equation, provide a better description of electron behavior in atoms.
Defined orbits around nucleus, no uncertainty principle
No, electrons do not move in orbits like planets around the sun. Instead, they exist in probabilistic cloud-like regions called orbitals, where their exact position is not precisely defined. This behavior is described by quantum mechanics, which contrasts with the classical mechanics governing planetary motion. While orbits imply a defined path, electrons are better understood in terms of their wave-like properties and the uncertainty principle.
Arnold Sommerfeld
Bohr assumed that electrons moved in fixed orbits.
Stationary orbits of an atom refer to the specific energy levels that electrons can occupy around the nucleus without emitting or absorbing energy. These orbits are defined by the quantized energy levels in which electrons can orbit the nucleus. The concept of stationary orbits forms the basis of Bohr's model of the atom.
Johannes Kepler introduced the concept of elliptical orbits in the early 17th century. His laws of planetary motion replaced the previously held idea of perfect circular orbits. This advance in understanding planetary motion led to the development of modern celestial mechanics.
Scientific observations, experiments, and calculations show that Earth orbits the sun due to the gravitational pull between the two bodies. This theory is supported by various sources of evidence, including the motion of celestial objects, the effects of gravity, and the concept of elliptical orbits.
The concept of gravitational force being a conservative force greatly influences the study of celestial mechanics. It allows for the conservation of energy and angular momentum in celestial systems, making it easier to predict the motion of celestial bodies over time. This principle helps scientists understand the stability of orbits, the formation of planetary systems, and the dynamics of galaxies.
Our planets are kept in their orbits around our star by the force of gravity.With all due respect, I should be surprised if the principle were not the samewhere you come from.
Niels Bohr proposed the idea that electrons have fixed orbits around the nucleus of an atom in his model of the atom in 1913. This concept helped to explain the stability of atoms and the spectral lines observed in hydrogen.
Planets do have gravity and are affected by it and they don't exactly float. They orbit the sun, which requires moving very fast. When you think about it, an orbit is something of a strange concept. When you throw and object, it follows a path that curves downward. The faster you throw it, the broader the curve. A similar principle applies to orbits. An planet in orbit is essentially in perpetual freefall, but its "sideways" motion creates a curve large enough that it continously misses the sun. All orbits work in this way