A footprint alone is not conclusive evidence because it may not definitively identify a specific individual. Footprints can be similar across multiple people or animals, and other factors like size variation, distortion, and contamination can affect the accuracy of footprint evidence. Additional evidence, such as DNA or eyewitness testimony, is typically needed to support the significance of a footprint in an investigation.
"No conclusive" means that there is not enough evidence, information, or proof to confirm a definitive conclusion or decision. It indicates uncertainty or lack of finality in a particular situation or outcome.
The test of ethyl and methyl alcohol may provide some evidence, but it is not necessarily conclusive. Further analysis and testing could be needed to confirm the presence and differentiate between the two types of alcohol definitively.
Yes, the vast majority of climate scientists agree that there is conclusive evidence showing that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are driving climate change. This consensus is supported by multiple lines of evidence, including historical data, climate models, and physical principles.
"No definite evidence" means that there isn't clear or conclusive proof to support a particular claim or conclusion. It suggests that further investigation or research is needed to establish a stronger case or argument.
Footprint calculator can be carbon footprint calculator or ecological footprint calculator, which can give data about your impact on environment.
No, the suspect's admission to guilt does not necessarily provide conclusive evidence in the case.
Inductive arguments are those supposedly supported by good, but not conclusive, evidence. The idea of conclusive or demonstrative evidence goes with deductive arguments, whereas the idea of less than conclusive or demonstrative evidence goes with inductive arguments. Inductive arguments are based on probability; if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
No. Conclusive scientific evidence has surfaced which shows that the internet is NOT a big truck.
"No conclusive" means that there is not enough evidence, information, or proof to confirm a definitive conclusion or decision. It indicates uncertainty or lack of finality in a particular situation or outcome.
When collecting gunpowder residue for analysis, yes, this is an accepted test.
The presence of a mountain lion in the area can be suggested by the large size and distinctive shape of its footprint in the snow.
A footprint left in a river bank is an example of a cast fossil. Over time, the footprint fills in with sediment and hardens, leaving a casting of the footprint.
Cancer following injection of cell-free filtrates
DNA evidence is very conclusive and some say 99% accurate, however it is possible to challenge it based upon faulty collection and/or faulty lab techniques. All evidence can be contaminated by faulty collection and preservation methods and it leaves the evidence open to challenge. One key component to preserving any evidence is maintaining a secure chain of custody of any collected evidence. from the time of collection to the end of the case in court every movement of the evidence must be documented.
The test of ethyl and methyl alcohol may provide some evidence, but it is not necessarily conclusive. Further analysis and testing could be needed to confirm the presence and differentiate between the two types of alcohol definitively.
Yes, the vast majority of climate scientists agree that there is conclusive evidence showing that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are driving climate change. This consensus is supported by multiple lines of evidence, including historical data, climate models, and physical principles.
Evidence Actually, no reason. You could shun the evidence or believe it, as none is 100% conclusive. If there was absolutely undeniable evidence, like one landed and said hi to you, there would be no sense to disbelieve them.