Because probes can land on surfaces of planets and moons whereas a telescope can't.
The YOSCO - much better
I think that means Hubble Space Telescope. It was carried into space by the Space Shuttle in 1990.
Because you do not have to look through air, or the atmosphere.
I cannot think of a telescope without mirrors, unless it is completely run by computer with digital imaging.
if you mean a space probe to be anything launched into space for a scientific purpose then the chandra space telescope is providing an increadible amount of information on other galaxys and bodies including finding planets around diffrent stars
it can see further.
It is a telescope and not a probe, so it doesn't really visit any place.
it should be the hubble space telescope because it can see 10 times better than a normal telescope
It is a space artifficial satalite
space probe
the question is wrongfour prob is better than two prob method as it eliminates the effect of wire imbedance as well as contact resistance
They don't. All earth bound telescopes, optical or not, must deal with a number of issues. But what do you mean by "better"? A radio telescope is better suited to pick up radio waves than an optical telescope, but an optical telescope is better for visible light. They each serve their purpose better than the other.
Since the Hubble Telescope is in space, it avoids interference from the atmosphere.
To observe a very faint star a large telescope is better than a small one.
They can pack a lot of light gathering power into a more compact body. And Maksutov-Cassegrain Telescope does much better.
telescope,satellite, space probe,space shuttle
The YOSCO - much better