answersLogoWhite

0

Time travel has some problems, but there are some physicists that think it might be possible.

Potential problems:

1) Father Paradox: If you went back in time and killed your father before you were conceived... what then?

2) Since you WERE in the past, would going back merely mean you would be where you WERE? Or would there be two of you in the past?

Some people propose there are an infinite number of "Time Lines" or alternate realities. Others say that the problems that exist with the idea show the idea is impossible.

Etc.

A.1] Perhaps if it IS possible then might there not be a "law" of some kind that prohibits the traveler from performing any direct act which would affect the current self.

A.2] I believe the question answers itself. But, if you were in the past then you would be visiting yourself (in the past) since it is your future self traveling back to see a past self consequently you would be unable to visit yourself before you were born, duh.

Similarly, should you be traveling into the future it would be a past self visiting a future self, but herein lies the possibility that the future self might not be a certainty due to the number of possible paths you might take. Example: If you visited yourself 1 hour in the future then the probability of that actually being your self might be 99.99%. Whereas visiting your future self 1 year in future might only represent a 75% probability of you actually being like that person due to the increasing number of decisions you might make, possibly exponentially. Which might mean that at some point, visiting yourself in the future would be useless as that future might never come about, or you may not even recognize yourself. But then again you should also realize that at some point in the future it would impossible for you to visit yourself in the past because you have already died. Again, duh.

It would be important to realize that at some point you are not actually visiting yourself, but a descendant representing your self, i.e. a son of a son of a son.

I'll stop here because thinking about the possibilities and probabilities, and the possible probabilities or the probable possibilities is giving me one heck of a headache. . . . whew!!

Oh! Dear. . . . ............................

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

Why is time travel bad?

Time travel is bad because when we travel, we worry about what has happened in the past and what will happen in the future. We will begin to lose sleep wondering about it. Also, it's physically impossible to do. It would be extremely hard to travel faster than the speed of light. It goes against some of the laws of physics.


What would be required for a spaceship to travel faster than the speed of light?

There is no known way to achieve this, as well as a great deal of consistent and convincing work in Physics over the past 100 years or so that says it's fundamentally impossible.


How does Stephan Hawking feel about time-travel?

Stephen Hawking was skeptical about the possibility of time travel. Although he found the idea intriguing, he believed that time travel to the past was likely impossible due to the lack of evidence and logical paradoxes it would entail. However, he considered the notion of traveling to the future as theoretically feasible through concepts like wormholes and time dilation.


What makes time travel possible?

It's not, exactly. Travel into the future is possible, at least theoretically, and in fact we're all doing it at one second per second. You could increase the rate by accelerating in space; according to the theory of relativity, this has the effect of making time pass more slowly for you, which is virtually the same thing as traveling into the future. At the speed of light, all times are the same time and all places are the same place.As a practical matter, any speeds we can achieve have a negligible effect on time, but the theory is sound.Traveling into the past is thought to be impossible because it would violate causality. As an illustration, consider the question "what if you went back in time and killed your grandfather before your father was conceived", also known as the Grandfather Paradox... you prevented your father from being born, so you can't have been born either, but if you weren't born you couldn't have killed your grandfather, so your father was born and thus so were you, except then you could go back and kill your grandfather...The easiest solution to the problem is to assume that anything that violates causality is impossible.Additional evidence that time travel into the past is impossible comes from, again, relativity. Traveling faster than light is effectively traveling into the past, and faster than light travel is impossible, so it makes sense that traveling into the past is also impossible.


What if one or two humans had the power to time travel to the past and change the past itself?

The popular theory to resolve the time travel paradoxes is quantum realities; basically, it says that everything that can happen does happen in another quantum reality. Also, when you time travel, you don't go into the past of your timeline; you go into the past of another reality and affect it instead.