It may not be accurate because people may not remember or accurately estimate how much sugar or salt they added, leading to imprecise data. Additionally, individual preferences and habits can affect how much sugar or salt a person adds, making it difficult to compare across participants. Using controlled measurements or observational methods may be a more reliable approach.
Previous answer: "because of infection" This person is obviously trying to be funny, the right word should be "Contamination", as for spread plate, the bacteria is more exposed to air as it is spread over the agar plate. Therefore, the result might not be accurate, as it might be contaminated. As for the pour plate method, the bacteria is in the agar itself, it is not exposed to air, thus, less risk of getting contaminated.
People are not trying to prevent tsunamis because scientists know tsunamis cannot be prevented.
they have tried to control it by trying to stop eruptions
Insert the gene into bacteria. -Apex
It is not possible to draw an accurate map because the Earth's surface is a three-dimensional sphere, while maps are two-dimensional representations that distort the surface in some way, such as with shape, distance, or area. This distortion is inevitable due to trying to project a curved surface onto a flat plane.
Computer aided videofit
In an Experimental investigation you are trying to answer one question. While in a descriptive investigation you are trying to describe something and comparative you are comparing one thing to another.
It depends on the context of what you are trying to measure. Different methods have different levels of accuracy depending on the situation. It's best to choose a method that is appropriate for the specific task at hand.
Well basically a investigation is when someone is trying to find out about something or someone while a experiment is testing a hypothesis and trying to get a conclusion
I'm not sure what you are trying to ask so I cannot provide an accurate answer to your question.
A scientist is trying to figure something out. The scientist makes a guess and figures out a way to test that guess. That is called an experimental investigation.
Many things can hinder a journalist's investigation. People might not be willing to talk. Laws might protect the privacy of an individual. Other sources the journalist is trying to use might have false information. It is up to the journalist to sift through what is fiction and find the truth.
Using a balance to measure mass might be part of a scientific investigation, but by itself and under ordinary circumstances it does not amount to a scientific investigation. If you are on a different planet or on a moon, or if you were in the weightlessness of space, then doing this (or trying to do it) might be considered a kind of investigation.
A civil investigation is an investigation related to a civil matter. A civil matter is a court action (or pending court action) that is not criminal in nature. An investigation related to the care of a child is a civil investigation if the opposing parent is trying to prove that their ex-spouse is not taking good care of the child. A criminal investigation would be if the police were investigating a complaint of child abuse which resulted in the harm, or potential harm, of the child. To put it simply, a civil investigation is any investigation that is not an investigation of a crime.
Trying to understand reality.
I suggest going to your local tax place, such as LibertyTax, or HR Block. And generally, they are, but you need to be aware of people who are trying to scam you.
He is trying to discover a method of fixing the poverty that his people(the Scottish) are living in. He does this by first giving a ridiculously inhumane way of solving the problem. This is then followed by his real solution near the end of the book.