answersLogoWhite

0

Because it is. There's no fundamental reason that we're aware of why it should happen to have the precise value it does ... it just does.

One of the things physicists (especially cosmologists) have been interested in is figuring out if there's some underlying reason that certain physical constants have the values they do, or if they're more or less "random".

It turns out there IS a "reason" why some values are what they are, and that reason is "if they were very different, we wouldn't be here to ask the question." For example, if the color force were slightly stronger than it is, all the hydrogen in the early universe would have converted to helium ... and the universe would be full of helium and nothing else, making it impossible for us to exist.

This is called the "Strong Anthropic Principle", and it sounds a bit arrogant, but it's true: the universe is the way it is because it makes us possible. (The reason it's not really "arrogant" is that we're not necessarily saying that the universe had us in particular in mind when it was "deciding" what its physical constants should be ... just that the fact that we DO exist puts constraints on what the values could have been. Some cosmologists suggest that our universe is only one of many, and nearly all the others are dead, lifeless, boring places, because their physical constants are such that they preclude the development of life.)

Beyond the strong anthropic principle, there may well be fundamental reasons why the, say, fine structure constant is what it is (almost exactly, but not quite, 1/137). But we don't know what they are. Yet.

The speed of light is one of the factors in the fine structure constant, which is why it's particularly germane to your question. If the fine structure constant were different from what it is by more than about 3%, then stellar fusion could not produce carbon, and ... you guessed it ... we wouldn't be here to ask the question.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Around what year will you accomplish traveling at the speed of light?

I will never manage.If someone else manages to accelerate something tangible to the speed of light it will be far in the future.


How do light and speed both appear as result from distance divided by time?

Probably that refers to the SPEED of light; and perhaps the speed of something else. Or speeds in general. A speed can be defined as a distance divide by a time, i.e., how much something moves in a second, or in a minute, for example.


Do radio waves travel at the speed of light at the speed of sound or something in between?

speed of light


How does the speed of light change in jello?

Light travels through different substances at different speeds. The speed will changeas it enters jello from something else, and again as it leaves jello and enters somethingelse. While the light is in the jello its speed is constant. A few on-line resources that wechecked gave that speed as roughly 217,400,000 meters per second. That's about73% of the speed of light in vacuum.


Why is light speed the ultimate?

This is because nothing else in the entire discovered universe moves as fast as the speed of light!


Why would speed warning light come on in vw eos?

Based on the information given in the question, I can think of three possibilities: -- The vehicle is moving at an excessive rate of speed. -- The speed sensor is defective. -- Something else is broke.


Is a speed of light faster than liquid?

The speed of electromagnetic radiation of all kinds, including light, is faster than the speed of anything else.


What travles at the speed of light?

All electromagnetic radiation does, and nothing else does.


What is the mass of the body which travels in the speed of light?

The only thing that travels at the speed of light, is light. Light is also said to have no mass, therefore the only way for something to travel at the speed of light is for it to have no mass.


Why is the speed of light what it is and not somthing else?

The speed of light simply is what it is. It is the time it takes for light to be initiated in one location and perceived in another. There is no other way to logically answer that question.


Why Lorentz Tranformation does not allow any object to reach the speed of light?

from a purely mathematical stand point, if something were to reach the speed of light the time dialation/length contraction formula would yield something over 0. This is beacuse the formula is: constant/[(1-(velocity/speed of light)^2] as you can see, if velocity=speed of light, you get something over zero.


How do you we find out speed of light?

something,some how and some where.