Why might industrialists want to argue that global warming is a natural process?

Answer 1

One valid reason would be that they have reviewed the facts and concluded that it is, in fact, a natural process. Noting that CO2 has never caused temperature variances and has always followed temperature would be a valid reason to believe this. Many climate experts also believe this to be the case.

Other reasons could include a desire to want to see the world remain stable and have the foods, medicines and energy we need to keep a modern world stable. The concept of eliminating CO2 production, which is primarily natural, could be perceived as having very drastic consequences. Keeping the status quo is also a valid reason to argue this point.

Finally, the possibility exists that some industrialists are reluctant to change. All humans tend to want a better world for the future. The consequences of a zero CO2 (from humans world) is very dire and foreboding. A world of limited power, ability to earn and eat is not very bright. Industrialists may want to understand the mechinisms of global warming and why it started thousands of years before the industrial revolution before lowering the standard of living for future generations.

Answer 2

Industrialists might argue that global warming is a natural process to deflect responsibility for their own contributions to climate change, such as greenhouse gas emissions. By framing it as a natural phenomenon, they may avoid regulation or pressure to reduce their environmental impact, protecting their financial interests. Emphasizing natural causes can also create doubt or confusion among the public about the urgency of addressing human-induced climate change.

Answer 3

Because then they would have no reason to stop their carbon dioxide emissions that are causing global warming.