I understand that the GWP formula is used to calculate the warming potential of an atmospheric gas. But when comparing water vapor to CO2, the greater impact of CO2 largely hinges on the time frame CO2 would theoretically remain in the atmosphere. While water vapor may only remain for a couple of days, CO2 has the potential to stay in the atmosphere for 20-100 years. But regardless of time frame, water vapor constitutes and exponentially higher percentage of the atmosphere. So even even if rain falls, since global evaporation and condensation occur at an equal rate, there will always be a gargantuan amount of it. The amount of CO2 in the air has little to no effect on warming, including all natural sources of it. (natural sources of CO2 are over 20 times greater than human-related emissions.) In fact, CO2 has been proven to be a positive feedback of global warming, rather than a precursor or cause. So my question is actually, why use this formula that is actually misleading in terms of CO2 impact on the warming of the earth? Wouldn't it be better if media spokespeople actually discussed each individual gases' abundance, composition of the atmosphere, location in the atmosphere, heat-trapping efficiency and impact on global temperatures?
The latest ozone-friendly refrigerant in use is R-32. It has a low global warming potential (GWP) compared to older refrigerants like R-410A, making it more environmentally friendly. It is being used in air conditioning and heat pump systems as a replacement for higher GWP refrigerants.
The Groundwater Information System (GWIS) developed by United Nations' Global Water Partnership (GWP) is not available for free download. However, you can access and use the online version of GWIS through their website after registering for an account. You can visit the GWP website for more information on how to access and use the GWIS platform.
[http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=carbon+steel&gwp=13 Click here for the answer from Answers.com]
Methane (CH4) is calculated as having a Global Warming Potential (GWP) of 86 over 20 years, and 34 over 100 years (much more powerful than CO2 which has a GWP of 1).
With the symbol of a chemical element - of course, if you think to a chemical formula.
No the file extension gwp can not be converted to any other format. The file extension gwp stands for Greetings workshop file.
The latest ozone-friendly refrigerant in use is R-32. It has a low global warming potential (GWP) compared to older refrigerants like R-410A, making it more environmentally friendly. It is being used in air conditioning and heat pump systems as a replacement for higher GWP refrigerants.
For an answer, try http://www.answers.com/grozny?cat=travel&gwp=13
http://www.answers.com/felix+Leclerc?cat=entertainment&gwp=13
you use Kitten formula!
You use the PRI formula
u dont use a formula
use the formula 2(pi)r=16pi use the formula 2(pi)r=16pi use the formula 2(pi)r=16pi use the formula 2(pi)r=16pi use the formula 2(pi)r=16pi
use the formula 2(pi)r=16pi use the formula 2(pi)r=16pi use the formula 2(pi)r=16pi use the formula 2(pi)r=16pi use the formula 2(pi)r=16pi
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=vagus+nerve&gwp=13
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=windmill&gwp=13
Deselect "Enable AnswerTips" at http://www.answers.com/main/transoptform?gwp=8