because Wegener was a meteorologist (weatherman ) and they were set on the idea of land bridges. Scientists at the time also believed that the plates did not move. Finally Wegener could suggest no plausible driving force for the plates to move.
lol
Henry Hess
kantot
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was rejected because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how the continents moved. Additionally, the scientific community at the time did not have sufficient evidence to support the idea of continents drifting. It wasn't until the theory of plate tectonics emerged later, providing a mechanism and supporting evidence, that continental drift became widely accepted.
The idea of continental drift faced resistance due to lack of a plausible mechanism explaining how continents could move. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics theory in the 1960s that provided a solid explanation for how continents move, leading to widespread acceptance. Additionally, scientific paradigms can take time to shift as new evidence accumulates and consensus builds within the scientific community.
lol
Henry Hess
It was extremely obvious to those who possess any shred of intelligence.
Alfred Wegener was the proponent of the Continental Drift Theory. The scientific community accepted this theory due to the phenomena of paleomagnetism, sea floor spreading and plate tectonics.
The scientific theory of continental drift was not immediately accepted by geologists.
Many geologists and scientists at the time made fun of Alfred Wegener's Drift Theory, dismissing it as implausible and unscientific. Wegener's theory of continental drift proposed that the continents were once connected and drifted apart over time, which was not widely accepted until much later when the theory of plate tectonics was formulated.
kantot
There was no visual proof
Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift was not accepted in his lifetime because he lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, his evidence was not widely considered sufficient or conclusive at the time, and he faced significant opposition from the scientific community, particularly geologists entrenched in the established theory of stationary continents.
One weakness of Wegener's proposal of continental drift was the lack of a mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's theory was not widely accepted at the time due to insufficient supporting evidence and the reluctance of the scientific community to accept such a radical idea.
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was rejected because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how the continents moved. Additionally, the scientific community at the time did not have sufficient evidence to support the idea of continents drifting. It wasn't until the theory of plate tectonics emerged later, providing a mechanism and supporting evidence, that continental drift became widely accepted.
The idea of continental drift faced resistance due to lack of a plausible mechanism explaining how continents could move. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics theory in the 1960s that provided a solid explanation for how continents move, leading to widespread acceptance. Additionally, scientific paradigms can take time to shift as new evidence accumulates and consensus builds within the scientific community.