Haiti's a very congested country, there are small buildings and houses as far as the eye can see. A 7.0 earthquake would crush any small structures in it's vicinity. Plus there were at least 52 aftershocks ranging from 4.5 up.
The earthquake was so destructive for a number of reasons:
The high death toll in the Haitian earthquake of January 2010 was due to a combination of factors, including poorly constructed buildings that collapsed easily, inadequate emergency response infrastructure, and limited access to medical care and supplies. Additionally, Haiti was already one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere, which exacerbated the impact of the disaster.
The two earthquakes occurred due to differing types of fault movement (thrust faulting in the Chilean quake vs strike slip faulting in the Haitian quake) and at two differing types of plate boundaries. In the case of the Chilean earthquake, this was at a convergent boundary where the Nazca oceanic plate is being subducted under the continental South American plate as opposed to the Haitian earthquake which occurred at a transform boundary between the Caribbean and North American plates which are both moving east but at differing speeds. The Haitian earthquake was also of lower magnitude (magnitude 7.0) than the Chilean earthquake (magnitude 8.8) however it caused more damage and led to a much larger number of injuries and fatalities due to the poor construction techniques used in Haiti. Please see the related questions for more information.
No, Haiti was not prepared for the earthquake that struck in 2010. The country lacked proper infrastructure, emergency response systems, and building codes, which contributed to the widespread destruction and high death toll.
There were numerous aftershocks following the 2010 Chile earthquake, with some measuring as high as magnitude 7.1. These aftershocks continued for several weeks after the main earthquake, causing further damage and fear among the population.
CNN reported that it measured a 7.0, which is pretty high compared to a scale from 1-10.
The high death toll in the Haitian earthquake of January 2010 was due to a combination of factors, including poorly constructed buildings that collapsed easily, inadequate emergency response infrastructure, and limited access to medical care and supplies. Additionally, Haiti was already one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere, which exacerbated the impact of the disaster.
The two earthquakes occurred due to differing types of fault movement (thrust faulting in the Chilean quake vs strike slip faulting in the Haitian quake) and at two differing types of plate boundaries. In the case of the Chilean earthquake, this was at a convergent boundary where the Nazca oceanic plate is being subducted under the continental South American plate as opposed to the Haitian earthquake which occurred at a transform boundary between the Caribbean and North American plates which are both moving east but at differing speeds. The Haitian earthquake was also of lower magnitude (magnitude 7.0) than the Chilean earthquake (magnitude 8.8) however it caused more damage and led to a much larger number of injuries and fatalities due to the poor construction techniques used in Haiti. Please see the related questions for more information.
No. There is no such thing as a "HAARP weapon". The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program or HAARP is a US military research project into the Ionosphere with the aim of improving communications capability. It has no connection to seismicity. For the cause of the Haitian earthquake that occurred in January 2010, please see the related question. For information on the HARRP project, please see the related link.
No, Haiti was not prepared for the earthquake that struck in 2010. The country lacked proper infrastructure, emergency response systems, and building codes, which contributed to the widespread destruction and high death toll.
The high death toll in the Sichuan earthquake was due to a combination of factors, including the earthquake's magnitude (7.9), its shallow depth, the region's high population density, and the prevalence of poorly constructed buildings that were not able to withstand the seismic forces. Additionally, the mountainous terrain made rescue and relief efforts challenging.
There were numerous aftershocks following the 2010 Chile earthquake, with some measuring as high as magnitude 7.1. These aftershocks continued for several weeks after the main earthquake, causing further damage and fear among the population.
yes yellow stone is in high alert of eruption witch can lead to our death...
High Blood
CNN reported that it measured a 7.0, which is pretty high compared to a scale from 1-10.
Better warning systems and improved construction techniques .
Yes magnitude 8.8 is a large earthquake. The Chile earthquake of February 27th, 2010 is the 5th largest ever recorded. In terms of energy it is 500 times more powerful than the magnitude 7.0 of January 12th, 2010 Haitian earthquake. Haiti was equivalent to a 32 megaton nuclear bomb (2,000 times the atom bomb on Hiroshima), where as the Chilean earthquake was equivalent to a 15.8 gigaton bomb (a million Hiroshima Bombs). There have been much larger earthquakes. The Indian Ocean earthquake of December 26th, 2010 was magnitude 9.1. It had the equivalent energy of a 67 gigaton bomb (4 million Hiroshima bombs), over 4 times as large as Chile 2010. The largest earthquake on record occurred in 1960 about 100 miles south of the Chile 2010 earthquake. It measured mag 9.5. It the equivalent energy of 178 gigatons of TNT or 11 million Hiroshima bombs. It is believed that the asteroid that struck the earth 65.5 million years ago causing the extinction of all non avian dinosaurs caused an earthquake 13.0 on the Richter Scale. This would have had the energy of 10,000 teratons of TNT or 6.6 billion Hiroshima Bombs. ( This is purely the earthquake and does not include energy calculations from other phenomena such as heat wave etc)
The Haitian people wanted to be free and to stop being slaves