Mendel used his results to form his law of segregation. He also fromed the law of independent assortment (but that isn't needed for the core course). This law segregation stated that an organisms characterisitics are made of two factors now known as alleles these factors are separated into each gamete, and unite during fertillization.
Mandel studied what we now call dominant and recessive traits. he showed how some traits of an individual could be passed to their young. most of his work was done on peas and actually rejected when he asked other scientists if they agreed. it wasnt until (i believe) after his death his work was 'rediscovered' and shown to be correct and useful. the nazi conscept of a pure race used information that we had gained about human genetics (such as if you have blond hair you must be homozygous for the blond gene) and, through some unbeknown to me process, decided that this made you better than others. one thing that is important to remember is that science can tell you what is true (or rather what may be true) and not what is morally correct. in my opinion, just because you are homozygous for a specific gene, doesnt mean you are morally superior or inferior than anyone else. i would go far as to say that most people agree with this now-a-days.
dalton wasnt the one who experimented with gold, rutherford was the one who did the gold foil experiment.
Galileo first observed the planet Mercury through his telescope in 1610.
because there wasnt that much
There would be no seasons.
she wasnt just famous for 1 she was famous for lots
talor swift wasnt famous as a kid
The planet Neptune.
Mandel studied what we now call dominant and recessive traits. he showed how some traits of an individual could be passed to their young. most of his work was done on peas and actually rejected when he asked other scientists if they agreed. it wasnt until (i believe) after his death his work was 'rediscovered' and shown to be correct and useful. the nazi conscept of a pure race used information that we had gained about human genetics (such as if you have blond hair you must be homozygous for the blond gene) and, through some unbeknown to me process, decided that this made you better than others. one thing that is important to remember is that science can tell you what is true (or rather what may be true) and not what is morally correct. in my opinion, just because you are homozygous for a specific gene, doesnt mean you are morally superior or inferior than anyone else. i would go far as to say that most people agree with this now-a-days.
he wasnt a poet dudebro
Al Capone wasnt he died of a disease
Absolutely ... the Jackson's were, and remain, a close knit family. until he was very famous he wanted fame and his family wasnt a big part of his life any more
im not sure but wasnt that: Newton?
i don't know but i can tell you it wasnt me
No he wasnt but im not sure hahaha
He was famous for saving so many peoples lives and if it wasnt for him lots of people would have died
no, he wasnt in power until 1933.