Lack of water or sunlight.
Four things are needed - food, water, sunlight. Fertile soil equals good food.
So your next suspects are water and sunlight. There are other considerations such as competion from other plants, drainage, pests and seed quality as well.
This might be thought of as a species if the group indicated was large enough to include all of the potential members that can breed and produce viable fertile offspring. This would mean that animals which can breed and produce infertile offspring such as horses and donkeys which can mate and produce offspring are not of the same species. This situation would be within the bounds of the question. When a group which is of one species but is of limited such a limited population that the only can breed with a small number of individuals and produce a fertile offspring it would be described as a bottlenecked population. This can lead to severe genetic drift in that population.
From what I've researched it would most likely be "non-woody". Trees are perennial woody plants. Woody plants include trees, herbs, shrubs and lianas.
Water plants need sunlight for photosynthesis, a process that allows them to convert sunlight into energy. This energy is essential for the plants to grow, develop, and carry out their metabolic functions. Without sunlight, water plants would not be able to produce food and would not survive.
Chloroplasts would be found in large numbers in green plants as that is where photosynthesis takes place.
The amount of sunlight, soil quality, and water availability are the characteristics of the plants that would most likely affect their growth in a specific location. Plants need adequate sunlight for photosynthesis, fertile soil for nutrients, and a proper amount of water to thrive.
Volcanoes.
That would be the FERTILE CRESCENT.
Of course otherwise there would be no dolphins
On the banks of the nile. In the process of a year the egyptians would plant, the nile would flood and nourish the plants, then the water would draw back, then it would leave a layer of smooth dirt that would leave the plants very fertile, and then the plants would grow strong.
'species' is an organism that can produce fertile offspring through reproduction (with the same species) Do not confuse mule as a species because it can produce fertile offsping when bred with a horse, a mule would ahve to produce fertile offspring when mating with another mule inorder to be classed as a species.
No, it is purely mineral with no organic material that would be needed by plants.
the soil on mars is infertile
Malthus is the person who believed that less fertile soil would need to be farmed if the labor force increased. This is because he thought the fertile soil would not produce enough food.
If it were possible - The new offspring would be classified under the male 'parent' animals bloodline.
This might be thought of as a species if the group indicated was large enough to include all of the potential members that can breed and produce viable fertile offspring. This would mean that animals which can breed and produce infertile offspring such as horses and donkeys which can mate and produce offspring are not of the same species. This situation would be within the bounds of the question. When a group which is of one species but is of limited such a limited population that the only can breed with a small number of individuals and produce a fertile offspring it would be described as a bottlenecked population. This can lead to severe genetic drift in that population.
No, they produce Co2 which is used for plants to breathe then the plants produce oxygen. This is wrong. Green algae produce 70 to 80% of the oxygen on earth. We would not exist without them.
Yes, most flowers do produce seeds. If you picked a flower up, and looked carefully at the core, you would most likely see that there are seeds. However, some plants are dioecious. In those plants, the female flowers would produce seeds while the male flowers would produce only pollen.