A linear accelerator works by having a magnet at the end of the accelerator. If the particle is neutral then it will not be attracted to the magnet and therefore nothing will happen, as in the case of a neutron.
Removing 10 electrons from an aluminum atom would have a greater effect on its mass compared to removing 1 neutron. This is because electrons have very little mass compared to neutrons. Each electron has a mass of about 1/1836th that of a neutron, so removing 10 electrons would have a much larger impact on the overall mass of the atom.
They don't really have a charge so it would be zero or no charge.
There is an upper limit to the mass of neutron stars because if the neutron star is too massive, neutrons would be crushed by the gravity of the neutron star, and the neutron star would collapse into a black hole.
There are no moons around a neutron star. A large, spherical body orbiting a neutron star would be considered a planet.
It would not exist. A neutron star is what it is by virtue of the mass of the whole star. Extracting just a pinhead would revert that matter back to normal matter. For the sake of density - as weight has nothing to do with matter outside of a gravitational body. The denisty of a pinhead of neutron star would be the equivalant of about 100 times the mass of the Great Pyramid of Giza
When planned withdrawals are more than planned injections, there is too little aggregate demand. I'm no economics expert so i don't know whether this would lead to a downward mutipler or a negative accelerator effect. Withdrawals are savings, taxes and imports and it seems to me that if savings increase, there would be a negative accelerator effect, but if imports increase, there would be a downward multiplier, but don't take my word for it.
Removing 10 electrons from an aluminum atom would have a greater effect on its mass compared to removing 1 neutron. This is because electrons have very little mass compared to neutrons. Each electron has a mass of about 1/1836th that of a neutron, so removing 10 electrons would have a much larger impact on the overall mass of the atom.
A neutron bomb, or enhanced radiation weapon (ERW), is a type of tactical nuclear weapon designed specifically to release a large portion of its energy as energetic neutron radiation rather than explosive energy. Neutron bomb would use nuclear fusion, but in a different way. The detonation of a neutron bomb would still produce an explosion, but one much smaller than a standard nuclear weapon's. The main effect of a neutron bomb would be the release of high-energy neutrons that would take lives far beyond the blast area. The result: fewer buildings, cars, tanks, roads, highways and other structures destroyed.
That would be the neutron
you would spin in a circle
No, a steering wheel is not classified as an accelerator. A steering wheel is used to control the direction of the vehicle, while an accelerator pedal is used to control the speed of the vehicle.
ten electrons. If u look on the worksheet it says that neutrons are particles with no charge
When all of the linear dimensions are doubled . . .-- the perimeter is also doubled-- the area is multiplied by 22 = 4.
They don't really have a charge so it would be zero or no charge.
A proton and a neutron added together would be Deuterium without an electron.
Removing ten electrons would have a larger effect on the mass of an aluminum atom than removing one neutron. Electrons have very little mass compared to protons and neutrons, so removing ten electrons would significantly decrease the mass of the atom. Neutrons contribute roughly the same mass as protons, so removing one neutron would have a smaller impact on the overall mass of the atom.
IF something is linear its a line