Smaller stars burn less fuel and live longer. A star like ours can exist for more than ten times the size of a star 50 times it's size.
The bigger the star, the stronger it's gravitational pull, and therefore the more intense the nuclear fusion at it's core. Massive stars have a tendency to explode long before they get to be the size of our sun, which has to do with how black holes form, sometimes they collapse back in on themselves.
The most massive stars; they will use up their fuel much faster than less-massive stars. or even low mass star which is less then half the mass of our sun may able to last more then a trillion years that is longer then the universe age
Most products could be made to last longer and create less waster by using different materials! To last longer you want materials that are strong and resist breaking or corroding, and to create less waste, you want materials that will break down quickly once exposed to certain conditions (for instance those found in a landfill).
Plastic and vinyl fencing requires much less maintenance and last longer than wood. While costing more in general upfront, the longer life makes the less expensive in the long run.
A 13.5 volt bulb will burn less brightly but last longer.
An bigger thing on Universe, the more gravity but the Black hole is small but has the most gravity pushing in it and Stars had more gravity than the planets just like an Guy with an big muscle. he had the ability to push and pull and object.
The smaller stars generally live longer due to less mass & less hydrogen is burned.
Stars that burn cooler and dimmer use less fuel, and so will last longer before they go out. smaller stars are generally more stable than larger ones, and so usually last longer because they contract into dwarf stars instead of going supernova. going with those assumptions, the longest-burning star would be a red dwarf star.
Yes
The more renewable energy we use the less non-renewable energy we use. And if we use less of it, it'll last longer.
No, sadly, it lasts less longer then the DS lite...
If by smaller, you mean ones with less mass, then the answer is yes. This is because while smaller stars have less mass to burn. They burn it more slowly and more efficiently thereby increasing their lifespan.
Although they can last longer most weak tornadoes last less than 5 minutes.
It all depends. On the speed of your internet, RAM, and how big the file is. The bigger file the longer. The slower internet the longer. The less ram even longer.
No because smaller stars can live longer than bigger stars and the big stars wont live as long but will end in a very violent explosion.That can result in a major supernova and even a black hole smaller stars will die in a much less violent way.
The most massive stars; they will use up their fuel much faster than less-massive stars. or even low mass star which is less then half the mass of our sun may able to last more then a trillion years that is longer then the universe age
In accordance with their mass. More massive stars by default are bluer and burn more quickly, go supernovae and can become a black hole or neutron star, depending on it's mass. Less massive stars are redder, last longer because they don't burn their fuel as furiously and don't go supernovae and don't become really dense stars after their "shed" their outer layer like the bigger ones do. There is even a category of 'failed stars', which is when a gas giant didn't get big enough to to activate nuclear fusion in its core. Jupiter is in this category. If it had been a bit bigger, it would have been another sun.
last longer and cost less on your bill