Answer 1
It is unlikely that humans will ever evolve tails again. Tails help to improve the balance of primates using an above-branch climbing locomotion, and other animals using quadrupedal locomotion techniques. Given that we're bipedal and are likely selected to remain so, it is unlikely that we'll re-evolve a tail unless the environment that we're adapting to changes dramatically. Even if the genes controlling the growth of a tail were to mutate, it would take the additive effects of more than a single mutation to cause a human to have a tail again, and so such genetic changes would likely be lost before they were even observed.
Answer 2
Hey, you never know!
Answer 3
It's difficult to predict whether the human race will re-evolve tails. That largely depends on future environmental changes. You really never know. On the other hand, it's unlikely that we'll re-evolve tails, because species usually evolve away from their primitive stages. But there is a rare phenomenon called atavism, which is sometimes observed in humans, where babies are born with a visible coccyx (last vertebral bone or the fused tail bone in humans).
Answer 4
No, because we never evolved in the first place. It is all a hoax and a brainwashing of the young, via engineered 'evidence'.
In fact, Denis Towers discovered the impossibility of evolution in his 10 year study comparing ground snakes with homo sapiens in a published work, "TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE!!" in 2007. It was concluded, after 10 years of examination, that snakes and homo sapiens present as complete opposites - both, behaviourally and kinesiologically (applied anatomically).
1. This discovery implies deliberation of design.
2. It also tends to support/validate the Biblical record of the Adam and Eve account, wherein it was the serpent who opposed Man in the Garden of Eden.
After the serpent's opposition to Man, God put a curse upon all things - one being that He changed the structure-nature of the serpent. [Genesis 3:14,15]
Why do comets have tails
Extinct volcanoes will never erupt again... I am not sure what stage but this is the best info I can give you.
Mosquitoes do not have tails. They have a long, slender abdomen that is often mistaken for a tail. This abdomen is used for digestion and reproduction.
Non-random mating, or sexual selection, may affect the direction of evolution in many ways. For instance, suppose that in a certain species of bird, the really strong and healthy males have a longer tail than the weaker males. The species might then, under influence of 'normal' natural selection evolve so that the females are attracted to males with long tails. Then sexual selection kicks in: it becomes advantageous for the males to evolve longer tails, whether or not they are strong males. You get a runaway spiral, until a situation is achieved in which all males have very long tails - while any association between tail-length and strength has long been lost.
Probably not... It has not erupted in more than 10 centuries.
Yes, humans evolved from ancestors who had tails.
You cant find it, you evolve it from a vulpix, then evolve it with a fire stone.
Most likely as cosmo is dead and tails and cream are the cutesy ever
to gt ninetales you have to catch and evolve a vulpix
It doesn't evolve again.
Rouge doesn't like Tails but Tails likes her I wish Rouge liked Tails
dialgla doesn't evolve
Ariados doesn't evolve again
no
No.
No, Tails has always been a boy despite confusions at the time of his debut.
Foxes do not wag their tails except for a small population resulting from a breeding experiment in Russia. Other than that tail wagging is unique to domestic dogs.