The object would probably disintegrate completely. The speed of light is 299,792,458 meters per second, that's fast enough to circle the globe at least 6 times. The force against the wind would have to be at least 500,000 pounds of pressure, and that's an underestimation. The object would most likely catch fire, as well.
You would be much heavier than normal. The mass of any object increases as its speed goes up.
According to the theory of relativity, as an object with mass approaches the speed of light, its momentum and energy increase significantly, but its mass remains constant. So, from the perspective of an observer, the object would appear to gain mass, but in its own frame of reference, it would not.
Mass = (Rest mass) / sqrt( 1 - v2/c2 )V = 0.9 cv2/c2 = 0.811 - v2/c2 = 0.19sqrt( 0.19 ) = 0.4359Mass = (rest mass) / 0.4359 = 2.294 x (rest mass)For a rest-mass of 100 kg, that's 229.4 kg at 0.9 c .
The shadow will fall on the opposite side that the light hit the object. Assuming that the object is a solid object that you cannot see through, there would be no light on the other side, hence causing the shadow.
To travel at the speed of light you would have to BE light so i guess you would became an even brighter light The switch to turn on the lights will work but no light will come on as you are already at that speed
If light travels through an object, it is still called light. If you want to specify, you might say "light travelling through an object".
The speed of light is constant. It is 671,000,000 mph.
Electrons are able to travel close to speed of light.
The speed of light doesn't travel at all. It just lays there, typicallyon a printed page in a book.If an object is traveling at the speed of light, however, then it's acompletely different story. Such an object would cover 1 quintillionmiles in only 170,108 years (rounded).
Nobody knows for sure. We have never witnessed a physical object traveling faster than the speed of light.
It is not possible for any physical object to accelerated to the speed of light. But in one particular extreme it is possible to slow the speed of light according to the Bose-Einstein Condensate. The question better stated would be "Would an independent observer see light emanating from a source that is traveling backwards at the speed of light?" Yes. Light always travels at the same rate. No matter how fast you are traveling, any light that you emit will always travel at a constant rate. (note that it's not possible for a physical object to actually travel at the speed of light in a vacuum).
You would be much heavier than normal. The mass of any object increases as its speed goes up.
Traveling on a beam of light is not possible for objects with mass, as light moves at the fastest speed in the universe and cannot be caught up to. Traveling at the speed of light would also cause time dilation effects, where time would appear to stand still for the traveler.
The red light would be absorbed by the green object and the object would appear dark. The green object reflects green light and absorbs other colors.
To an outside observer a person traveling at the speed of light would be frozen in time. To the person traveling at the speed of light, things would seem normal.
Time required to do what? To move from one place to another, divide the distance by the speed of light.
A green object under green light would appear green, as the light matches the object's color. The green light illuminates the object, causing it to reflect the same wavelength of light that it absorbs, resulting in no change in its perceived color. If the light were a different color, the object's appearance would change based on the light's wavelength and the object's ability to reflect or absorb that light.