I presume the question refers to the "redshift" of distant galaxies.
Actually it is the other way around - i.e. the Doppler redshift helps to support and explain the Big Bang Theory.
This "redshift" is called the "cosmological redshift". Strictly speaking, it's not the Doppler effect.
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.
The big bang theory explain the creation of everything. It gives the explanation of beginning of our universe and it's evolution
If the Doppler shift indicated a blue-violet shift in the spectrum of distant galaxies, it would suggest that those galaxies are moving toward us rather than away, contradicting the current understanding of the expanding universe as described by the Big Bang theory. The Big Bang theory is supported by the observation of redshift in the light from distant galaxies, indicating they are receding due to the expansion of the universe. A blue shift would imply a contraction or a different cosmic scenario, prompting a reevaluation of fundamental cosmological principles. Thus, it would challenge the prevailing model of cosmic expansion.
There are various scientific theories about the origins of matter, but the Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted explanation for the early moments of the universe. If the Big Bang theory were to be proven false, it would require a new, evidence-based theory to explain the creation of matter. However, as of now, the Big Bang theory remains the prevailing scientific understanding of the universe's origins.
The redshift of galaxies is evidence for the Big Bang theory because it shows that the universe is expanding. When light from distant galaxies is redshifted, it means that those galaxies are moving away from us, indicating that the universe is getting larger and supporting the idea that everything originated from a single point in a massive explosion.
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.
You might say that. But it's probably closer to the truth to say that it worked in exactly the opposite way . . . The Big Bang theory is an attempt to explain the shift toward red in the spectra of all distant galaxies, along with many additional observational facts in Astronomy, Physics, and Cosmology.
The big bang theory explain the creation of everything. It gives the explanation of beginning of our universe and it's evolution
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
If the Doppler shift indicated a blue-violet shift in the spectrum of distant galaxies, it would suggest that those galaxies are moving toward us rather than away, contradicting the current understanding of the expanding universe as described by the Big Bang theory. The Big Bang theory is supported by the observation of redshift in the light from distant galaxies, indicating they are receding due to the expansion of the universe. A blue shift would imply a contraction or a different cosmic scenario, prompting a reevaluation of fundamental cosmological principles. Thus, it would challenge the prevailing model of cosmic expansion.
All modern models based on science that are worth their salt would be. The only major theory I know about the origin of the universe is the Big Bang Theory, which is supported by Red Shift observations. Galaxies we can observe are all moving away (we know this due to Red Shift) from a central point, believed to be the epicenter of the Big Bang.
A tv show on channel 2
Red shift caused by the galaxies moving apart.
massive energy created matterTo get to the theory ... the red shift (and Hubble).If you're referring to how the big bang began, science has no answer.
Why our Universe is composed almost entirely of matter, with almost no anti-matter in it.
There are various scientific theories about the origins of matter, but the Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted explanation for the early moments of the universe. If the Big Bang theory were to be proven false, it would require a new, evidence-based theory to explain the creation of matter. However, as of now, the Big Bang theory remains the prevailing scientific understanding of the universe's origins.
The Big Bang theory was set up to explain observations - for example, the redshift of distant galaxies, which is usually interpreted to mean that the galaxies move away from us.