answersLogoWhite

0

The second electron gain of an oxygen atom would be expected to be less negative. The reason for this outcome is that the oxygen atom gaining a second electron already has one electron and thus a negative charge. This negative charge repels the second electron to some extent, making the enthalpy of this process less negative than when the first electron was added to the neutral oxygen atom.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is a negative and positive word for vindicate?

Disgusting and Beautiful


Justify why the absolute value of a number is never negative?

If it had a sign it wouldn't be an absolute value, which is neither positive nor negative, merely absolute.Note that the absolute value of a number is non-negative by definition.For x < 0, |x| = -x (which is positive)For x &ge; 0, |x| = x (which is never negative)


What is meant by the ethical principle that the end does not justify the means?

It means that even if what you are aiming for in the long run is a positive thing, using negative methods to do it is not justifiable. Hope this helps!


Does -1 -4 --4 justify your answer?

No. The question contains three negative numbers. There is nothing to justify!


What type of ion might sodium form Justify your answer.?

Sodium typically forms a sodium cation (Na+) since it tends to lose one electron to achieve a stable octet configuration. This results in a positive charge on the sodium ion as it has one less electron than protons.


Racism was used to justify negative attitudes toward both slaves and immigrants from?

Ireland - apex


Scientific racism was used to justify negative attitudes toward both slaves and immigrants from?

Ireland - apex


How do you justify the position of hydrogen at the top of various group?

Hydrogen was placed in the first group because has a high tendency to loss an electron.


What scientific racism was used to justify negative attitudes towards both slaves and immigrants from?

Ireland


What is the significance of the phrase "the ends justify the means" in relation to ethical decision-making?

The phrase &quot;the ends justify the means&quot; suggests that achieving a positive outcome justifies any actions taken to reach that goal, regardless of their ethical implications. This concept raises important questions about the morality of our actions and whether the consequences of our decisions can justify unethical behavior.


How will you justify salts are neutral compound?

Salts are neutral compounds because they are formed from the reaction between an acid and a base, which neutralizes the acidic and basic properties. Salt molecules have equal numbers of positive and negative ions, resulting in a net charge of zero, making them electrically neutral.


How can you justify the disappearance of oxygen as a measure of electron transport?

In the electron transport chain Oxygen is the final electron acceptor. Also the Oxygen accepts 2 Hydrogen ions, making water in the process. The dissapearance of Oxygen shows that the electron transport chain is working and that Oxygen is doing its job.