Only sensational
No. They make up stories all the time.
Some media outlets concentrate on sensational "reporting" because they know sensationalism sells. When the public stops buying the magazine, or visiting the website, or turns off the television, these media outlets move on to the next sensational story. Sometimes, where there is no sensational story, the media milks it from all angles to create the drama. It's all about advertising dollars; when no one buys the product, watches, views, then the ads give no financial returns. Then, of course, the media must figure out a new way to make us "tune in".
NO. Indian media is bias.
At this time - there is much speculation and even "persons of interest" but despite several sensational stories to the contrary, no credible evidence exists that her body has ever been found.
Ask yourself if the source of the information is credible.
responsibility of indian media is to show all the things happening around the world
The adverb of sensational is sensationally.
Sensational; amazing, unbelievable,
My husband planned a sensational surprise birthday party for me.
Paul Gascoigne, commonly known as Gazza, did not join the Illuminati. The Illuminati is often referenced in conspiracy theories as a secret society that supposedly controls world events, but there is no credible evidence linking Gazza or any public figure to such an organization. Any claims about him joining the Illuminati are likely fictional or part of sensational media narratives rather than factual information.
Adharsh Media Marys Info Media
Sensational journalism expanded because it attracts a larger audience seeking entertainment and sensational content. As literacy rates and access to news increased, media outlets focused on scandal-mongering to stand out in a competitive market. This shift aimed to capture attention and boost readership and sales.