An article discussion is a conversation or debate about the content, arguments, or conclusions presented in an article. It involves reviewing, analyzing, and sharing perspectives on the article's ideas, validity, and implications. Article discussions can take place in various settings, such as academic seminars, online forums, or book clubs.
The editor's decision to start the article with a discussion on the nature of the topic was influenced by the need to provide context, establish the importance of the subject, and engage the reader from the beginning.
A scientific review article typically includes an abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, and references.
Ghada Hozayen has written: 'A study of the discussion sections of the medical research article'
When a character is revealed by clear descriptions by the author this is called
Poker is played with a regular fifty-two-card deck of playing cards. For a discussion of the game of Poker, including rules and variants, see the Wikipedia article on Poker. For a discussion on playing cards in general, including their history, see the Wikipedia article "Playing card."
A primary research article presents original research findings conducted by the authors, while a scientific review article summarizes and analyzes existing research on a specific topic. Look for methods, results, and discussion sections in a primary research article, and a comprehensive overview of existing research in a review article.
It depends how far back you want to go. See the wikipedia article on Kenneth MacAlpin for much discussion.
Challenging Established Ideas (Apex Approved)
I'm sort of having trouble on this question, too, but after reading an article, the topics that Socrates considered important for discussion were democracy, patriosm, and religion. Again, I'm not really sure if this is the right answer but hope helps :)
The article's talk page (at the top, there's a tab that says Discussion) is one place. On some articles, you'll see a box that asks you to comment on the article - if you do, that goes into Wikipedia's new Article Feedback commenting tool. Either method works. :)
The correct sequencing of the sections of the main body of a journal article typically follows this order: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. The Introduction outlines the research question and context, the Methods detail the approach taken to conduct the study, the Results present the findings, and the Discussion interprets the results and their implications. Some articles may also include a Literature Review section before the Methods or combine Results and Discussion into one section.
Yes, The Road by Cormac McCarthywww.oprah.com/article/.../road/road_book_questions