Well there were no Roman newspapers (no printing presses for another 1,500 years).
They had to use other means of getting the message out, like reading out and posting notices or decrees in the squares of cities, and erecting statues, monuments, triumphal arches etc with inscriptions on them. And then there was grafitti on walls.
A basic means of spreading messages was coinage, which everyone saw as a matter of routine eg, when Brutus fled to the east after murdering his patron Caesar, he had coinage struck with his image promoting himself as getting rid of a would-be king; later, an emperor trying to promote family life struck a coin with an effigy of the empress and her children looking cute; and so on.
Inscriptions (whether Roman, Persian, Greek etc) were partly propaganda, partly commemorative, partly communicative. They would be nearest to today's editorial.
An example is Augustus columns in which he sets out his achievements, beginning:
'Below is a copy of the acts of the Deified Augustus by which he placed the whole world under the sovereignty of the Roman people, and of the amounts which he expended upon the state and the Roman people, as engraved upon two bronze columns which have been set up in Rome'
Roman Republic
The Caesarian. idk really bbut that's my best guess.
That would be the 'editorial'.
it would cost 5 yins
You may be referring to a "crusading" editorial. While newspapers are expected to be objective in reporting the news, there have been a number of newspaper editors who believed in a cause and promoted it through their newspaper's editorial page. Some editors took a stand about ending child labor, or ending segregation, or exposing government corruption, etc. On the editorial page, the opinion of the editor is often considered the official viewpoint of that newspaper. So a crusading editorial would be an editorial which forcefully advocates for a specific cause and demands some kind of action.
you
A windmill in Ancient Roman times would be unscrambled as "niskefllau."
The ancient Roman looked like the modern Roman except he would be wearing a toga and tunic, whereas the modern Roman would be wearing a suit and tie or jeans and tee shirt.The ancient Roman looked like the modern Roman except he would be wearing a toga and tunic, whereas the modern Roman would be wearing a suit and tie or jeans and tee shirt.The ancient Roman looked like the modern Roman except he would be wearing a toga and tunic, whereas the modern Roman would be wearing a suit and tie or jeans and tee shirt.The ancient Roman looked like the modern Roman except he would be wearing a toga and tunic, whereas the modern Roman would be wearing a suit and tie or jeans and tee shirt.The ancient Roman looked like the modern Roman except he would be wearing a toga and tunic, whereas the modern Roman would be wearing a suit and tie or jeans and tee shirt.The ancient Roman looked like the modern Roman except he would be wearing a toga and tunic, whereas the modern Roman would be wearing a suit and tie or jeans and tee shirt.The ancient Roman looked like the modern Roman except he would be wearing a toga and tunic, whereas the modern Roman would be wearing a suit and tie or jeans and tee shirt.The ancient Roman looked like the modern Roman except he would be wearing a toga and tunic, whereas the modern Roman would be wearing a suit and tie or jeans and tee shirt.The ancient Roman looked like the modern Roman except he would be wearing a toga and tunic, whereas the modern Roman would be wearing a suit and tie or jeans and tee shirt.
A stola
A Roman patriot would be an ancient Roman citizen who took pride in being a member of the Roman Empire.
That would be the 'editorial'.
This section usually contains three items. 1/ Two or three articles on current events which reflect the viewpoint of the paper's publishers and editors. 2/ Letters from readers who comment on the news of the day and the way it was reported. Some letters comment on the letters previously published. It is a form of public debate and can get very heated. 3/ The political cartoon. which again offers an opinion on current affairs.