No. As long as the patient is a legal adult, it is his or her choice whether to seek treatment. If the person's injuries are substantial and obvious, that person will be seen immediately. However, if someone is in the waiting room and chooses to leave, all the nurse can do is encourage him or her to stay. Ultimately, the choice is up to the patient.
no. it would be the nurse who is liable. the nurse was acting illegally in the first place.
$2,500
primary
Probably not, but if the hospital accepted you as a Medicaid patient you should not be liable for their delay.
Those other insurers would be the "primary" insurers.
"liable" ... The other insurer is the primary payor.
yes, sometimes a doctor can cause emotional distress by making the patient think about their illness or problem.
No, as a non-contracted provider with Medicare, the physician is not required to submit claims on behalf of the patient. It is the patient's responsibility to submit the claim to Medicare for reimbursement. However, the physician may choose to submit the claim as a courtesy to the patient, but they are not obligated to do so.
You would have to look at the summary page of your policy. Whatever the insurance company says you have to pay.... or if the provider is not contracted, whatever they want to bill you.
Liable and flyable. I'm not liable if it's not flyable or not reliable!Plyable, Liable,
Extremely difficult problem, which clearly hinges on the reasons the family wish to oppose the discharge. If the family and/or the patient feels that problems still exist with this patient that the hospital hasn't addressed, I'd bring this up with the department head for that pathology. If the hospital discharges a patient against their will, and the patient turns out to be correct (which happens a LOT), and then the patient's pathology reasserts, the hospital can be legally liable, and the PR for that sort of thing is awful. Note also, the family can choose to readmit the patient through the ER under EMTALA rulings (depending on the pathology). To force a discharge on a patient that feels care is incomplete is dangerous. The hospital will need to really perform due dilligence, showing the discharge is absolutely medically justified. Ideally, the patient, doctor, team and family all agree on the discharge. If however, the patient is incompetant, or wishes to leave, but the family doesn't wish the responsibility, this needs to be passed to your Social Services group for placement. In either case, the paliative team isn't in much of a position to do anything -- you're reactive; not proactive. My advice would be to submit whatever reports are appropriate and take extra care to assure form as well as accuracy. I should also ask, does the paliative team feel the discharge is the appropriate action in this case?
No, a co signor would not be liable. A co-buyer would be liable.